correct. good work.
how easy was it to follow ?

__________________
mickthemiller - considered the worlds best greyhound. 1940s

Mick
Do you have the figures for a place for the rejects?

__________________
Dear Lord
Please let me break even. I need the money.

after getting all horses which qualify under rule 1 and 2 and 6.
ignore rule 4.
from these qualifiers I eliminated those which don't comply to rule 3
i.e ls odds of 10.00SP or more.
( 47 runs, 2 wins $ 6.00 rtn..... 12 places $ 50.80 return )
of these those that began at 11.00 or more ( 0/29 wins, 7/29 placegetters for $ 40.10

worth noting is that 18 of these began under 11.00 odds ( 2 wins $6 rtn, 5 places for $ 10.70


now those further that began over 11.00 odds , but passed rule 3 were
32 horses ( 0 wins, 3 places $ 12.70 rtn )

thus 47 2 6.00 12 50.8
+ 32 0 0.00 3 12.7

= 79 2 6.00 15 63.5
less 18 2 6.00 5 10.7

equals 61 horses 0 wins 10 places 52.80 rtn

__________________
mickthemiller - considered the worlds best greyhound. 1940s

Mick, I may have missed something or perhaps I'm just stupid, but if there were 2 winners at "odds of 10.00SP or more" how can the return be less that $20.00?

thanks for your input Dennis.

this fact 47 runs, 2 wins $ 6 return

refers to horses which do not meet rule 3
( last start odds of 10.00 or more )

I may have made it difficult to understand.
ls odds of 10.00SP or more , should be last start odds of 10.00Sp or more.

Thanks
mickthemiller

__________________
mickthemiller - considered the worlds best greyhound. 1940s