#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sportz, i shop around for the best price[only have 3 different accounts]2 of them had $1.42, but SPORTSTAB had them @ $1.35 -$1.30, i stay away from them on H2H most times and back their different options ,which a lot of times ARE BETTER than the others.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Poms have the advantage of bowling first tonight. Will be tough for the Aussies.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() i dont think bowling first is an advantage
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Not usually, but these games are starting pretty early over there and the conditions have been favouring bowlers so far in the tournament. I think just about every single captain has sent the opposition in.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() looks like Gough's put on a few kilos ....I remember one year when he was out here he worked his guts out and had about 500 catches dropped off his bowling .I did alright that series they were offering silly odds that year I picked up the draw in brisbane(the gabba got flooded) and the win in melbourne they were paying 8 or 9 dollars
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Whats the go ?"
No sportz, the go is that at $1.33 and $3.10 the house cut is probally so large there's no value at all :wink: IF there is ANY value, it'd be on the kiwi's. But they'd need at least a 34% chance to justify a bet on them. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "house cut is probally so large there's no value at all"
I meant to say that the house cut IS so large that there is PROBALLY no value at all. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mr J, the best value was on England to win the whole tournament. :wink:
Personally, I got $8 and I know that Mav got $9. I rated them about a $4 chance. Now we can just wait to see who their final opponents are and save on them. Still think England are hopeless Chuck? [ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-09-22 07:34 ] |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() England batted well. Lee is crap and needs to be dropped for good :smile:. Very poor performance by the aussies.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Told ya. I have no idea why they continue to pick him. He simply concedes FAR too many runs. I haven't actually seen the scorecard yet, but I'm guessing it was the same last night. Eventually the selectors may learn but I'm not holding my breath. They're obviously still rating him on how he was bowling before the injury. [ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-09-26 06:16 ] |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|