Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10th October 2005, 03:51 AM
saratoga samchaz saratoga samchaz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 318
Default

Pretty much a joke if Sir Dex doesn't get in after the prep races he has run. He's beaten some very good ones and only has the one bad race as I recall(last out).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10th October 2005, 06:07 AM
Raw Instinct Raw Instinct is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Queensland
Posts: 2,628
Default

SS it is a joke if either of those horses don't make the field they are both top quality stayers and are both very realistic chances in this race but if they both get in they are only just going to scrape in.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10th October 2005, 07:54 AM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,067
Default

I really think that they should do everything in their power to get the best in form horses into the big races. For example, perhaps the first 4 or 5 horses home in the Turnbull Stks and Yalumba Stks plus the winners of a couple of other races on Oct 1 & 8 should all be exempt from the ballot. It would be ridiculous if Confectioner and/or Sir Dex don't get in and some of the other non performing qualified horses do.

Last edited by Sportz : 10th October 2005 at 07:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10th October 2005, 08:15 AM
Tenacious Spirit Tenacious Spirit is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 304
Default

No Sir Dex has not run a bad race. His last start was good. It is a joke if Sir Dex does not get into the field. He should be in the top 4 in the betting not struggling for a spot in the field. Our WFA ranks are poor, and he has stood up as a shining light as has Confectioner. Aside from these two, give some of the youngsters a chance, railings etc, rather than including horses like plodder bullet. I wouldn;t have a clue about how the process and am just putting forward this opinion from a fair/unfair rationale, but what has plod bullet done to get into the field? Count Ricardo, Grey Song, Swift Tango, Moscow ballet the list goes on of hacks who shouldn;t be there.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10th October 2005, 09:03 AM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,067
Default

Well, basically it works like this: The winners of a handful of races are exempt from the ballot and can run as long as their owners/trainers want them to. They're the first three on the order of entry list - El Segundo, Leica Falcon, Perlin. Then, the rest of the order is based purely on the weight assigned to them by the handicapper. This whole system seems a bit silly really because it's all based on the handicapper's original opinion of the horses a couple of months before the race is actually run.

The higher up the horse's handicap weight is compared to weight for age, the more likely it is to gain a start. That's why owners/trainers will often actually want their horses to be given a penalty by the handicapper after winning one of the lead up feature races. It's because it will raise their horse up the order of entry.

WFA for Hollow Bullet is 54 whereas WFA for Confectioner and Sir Dex is 58. That means that on the weights, Hollow Bullet is just 2.5 kgs below WFA, and Sir Dex and Confectioner are 5 and 5.5 kgs below. That's why they're so far down the list.

Hope that explains it a bit for you.

Last edited by Sportz : 10th October 2005 at 09:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10th October 2005, 09:32 AM
saratoga samchaz saratoga samchaz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 318
Default

Sportz, thanks for the explanation. It does clear it up for this Yank. I also didn't see Sir Dex's last race but I thought he didn't hit the board and just ran an allowable bad one, but now knowing he didn't, it still stinks if he doesn't get in considering his recent form (that the handicappers don't consider! LOL).
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10th October 2005, 09:40 AM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,067
Default

Yeah, nothing wrong at all with Sir Dex's last run. A good 4th and he finished ahead of Plastered, Vouvray and Dizelle which are all given excellent chances in the cup. Those three horses will all probably be more suited this week however.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10th October 2005, 09:48 AM
Stix Stix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,013
Question Will they or won't they ?

Will the discetionary powers be used to leap frog Confectioner above 6 other horses.....?

He (Confectioner) clearly has the best case to be included..... but how do you justify burning 6 other horses and their connections - I would be absolutely ropable if I missed out......

Still.... hope he runs (doubtfull).... cos my money has been on him for a long time.....

What do others think?
__________________
Stix
.......Giddy Up..... !!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10th October 2005, 10:04 AM
saratoga samchaz saratoga samchaz is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 318
Default

Thanks about the Sir Dex finish. I wasn't sure if he just didn't fire or got a nice fourth or fifth. He really is a gamer(No Blue Collar Jack, but heh!!! LOL) and usually gives it his all. But he sure doesn't like to win by much and always gives me heart attacks. Then again he doesn't like to lose either! That's one intangible that I love in a horse, HEART. Reminds me alot of Silver Charm and Real Quiet over here in their hey day. They actually have determined that some of the best horses actually do have much larger hearts than their counterparts. SECRETARIAT-maybe the greatest of all time-no THE GREATEST- anywhere(IMO and alot of others) had a HUGE heart and that's what started the weird study in the first place.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10th October 2005, 04:36 PM
Oaksnaf Oaksnaf is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 450
Default

They were saying Confectioner has bigger tabs on racing in the Caufield Cup because of the amount of money which has been put on the horse. Now to me they inclusion of a horse should be inconclusive of the amount of money being backed on the horse before its included or not included in the race. But that was said on Racing Retro the other night.
__________________
GO VOUVRAY
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:53 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655