|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yes, but it was just not a game where you should have labelled any team as a certainty. The Cowboys against the Knights was definitely the best bet of the weekend, not the out of form Roosters against the in form Tigers. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Ah sportz, if u go back and read the thread you will find that he said the cowboys are capable of producing a shocker and he thought they were due. I only replied to that context and never in my reply did i accuse him of him saying they were going to lose.......... I just wanted to fill him in that in the past 16-18 months i havent seen the cowboys even play badly.......
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Oh sorry. Didn't see that.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
I haven't seen a game of league for over a year Sportz, i really wouldn't have a clue, just trying not to kick a man while he's down.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
jose u really make these forums seem f-cking useless with amazingly bad tips like this.
i dont mean to be insulting or offensive but come on... 1.28 "bet of the century" and it lost you can't expect anyone to listen to you from now on. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
GEEZ MR K thats a bit harsh .........Ive seen some "nailed on certainties" put up by other people on here that went down in a screaming heap.....and to qualify that I think he said to stay away from his tips ....goodmorning ... hi ho hi ho its off to work i go ...got to earn some money so the poor bookies can feed their families
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
i know it was harsh and i've also seen 'nailed on' results lose. I've predicted things to win at times and suggested they were certain and seen them LOSE too, but the way jose put so much emphasis on how certain this win was and considering the low low odds and to make things worse, the "TIP OF THE CENTURY" label AND then it LOST!!!!!!... it's all like a nightmare.
better luck next time jose. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Couldn't really call it a tip of the century with so many other people tipping them. @$1.28 obviously they are short priced favourites and expected to win. I would like to see the next tip of the century to at least pay even money....
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
How about Tigers to bt Warriors
why? * Tigers did thrash the warriors last year at the very same stadium *Make that 46 points * Scott Prince is in form * Hodgeson hasnt missed a goal as of yet * Tigers did beat the bulldogs and roosters They are paying $2.35 or +4.5 |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I for one won't be on the Tigers to win this one in Christchurch. I watched both games with interest last week and to my shock the Tigers won over a strong Roosters side, not taking anything away from the Tigers win but the Roosters where not on par with the Tigers skills last weekend. But neither was the Ref. As for the Warriors they came out fired up in the second half and absolutely smashed Souths alloer the park. I think the Warriors have geled as a side and should dispose of the Tigers with ease. Warriors 13+ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|