Ah.... something I can agree with.

My goodness gracious me!
This man has hit the nail on the head.
If only I had the willpower to walk out of a tote or track after 13 minutes.
Remember that we are all experiencing entertainment at our pursuit as well.
If Kenchar gets off prematurely good luck to him.
I'm more of a stayer

Carsh, is right if you look at it from his mathematical point of view.

There was a current affairs segment on how to consistantly win those free prizes you enter from various newspapers and magazines. Those cut-outs.

All promotional stuff, but it showed if the numbers are played right, you actualy can win these free prizes.

How ?
Let's say there was a free competition to win a washing machine.
Then there is another free competition to win a the latest wiz-bang PC
And lets say there are 10 more of these various free competitions.
Each of these promotional competitions require you to fill out the usual name,address, age,favorite color, star sighn etc etc etc. cut it out and snail-mail it by dead-line close date.

The trick with the niumbers side of things is , NOT to enter the same competition as many times as possible, but to enter as many competitions as possible, ONCE.
So if there are 10 competitions, all free to enter chances are you will be in front by winning a prize from one of the draws.
But you won't win if you enter the same draw 100 times.

Same principle, ain't it ?

"Fuzzy Logic" isn't that a bit contradictory.

I remember when the warm fuzzies came out - some moron's idea of warming up to the customer.


Shouldn't it be Crystal Logic or Clear Logic?, no - a double entendre Fuzzy meaning customer friendly or easy to use logic.

Next time I'm at the optometrist and view an eyechart, I'll tell them it's fuzzy (meaning easy to read) and walk out wearing Mr. Magoo glasses

__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 426,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/10/2025
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg

No it ain't. Your analogy argues that to bet on lots of horses in the same race would be bad but that to bet on one horse in lots of different races is good. Crash isn't that clear in what he's on about but I think his (original) argument was about one horse per race. Of course the thrust of what he (meant to say) said may change as he works his way around his original blunder.

KV

So Crash, using your logic:

There is a greater chance that you are right, because you are the only one that agrees with what you are saying.
Because there are many of us that disagree with your logic, we are probably wrong.

Well whatever makes you happy.

The truth is the truth buddy.
Don't matter whether one or a million an' one agree!

Kenny,
A negative market is a negative market. If you are one of the lucky ones and are winning in it. The only reason you would be doing so is that you are smart enough to make it a positive one for yourself and have joined the 5% of very smart punters. If everyone is a winner, where does the profit come from ? The negative market the other 95% of punters belong too of course.

In reply to syllabus snide comment about how do I know how many bets pro punter's have, You obviously haven't heard of the Ausrace forum. A lot of big bet pro punters there. I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for an invite from another member to join though so you can post. It's an em forum but I think you can [still?] view the banter on site [you might learn something].

Angel417
quote::"wHATS THE USE?
GIVE UP CRASH,i CERTAINLY HAVE.
aS MY MY DEAR OLD DEPARTED DAD USED TO SAY,YOU CANT EDUCATE MUGS"

Great advise.

Well there are few of smart cookies here who get my point [boy, it wasn't that difficult]. The rest of you Flat Earther's can sod off back into La La land and I hope all your winning bet tickets [if any] get put through the wash :-)