I must admit, I raised a few queries about Bert's method.
But Shaun you are so right. I was looking forward from memory to watching EIs Stable System in action until others shot it down before it could even be given a fair go.
I have my own stable system and I'm doing very well out of it.

Hi, Bert.
Would there be any merit in reducing the minimum allowable dividend of $4.00 to say, $3.50? I realise the outlay will increase as losers are struck, but the strike rate of winners will also increase. From my understanding, this might have avoided the criticism directed against yesterday's performance even though one day's results is hardly conclusive.
Is the $4.00 minimum a notional figure or did you actually test a lesser cut-off dividend, and consequently discovered that $4.00 was the ideal minimum dividend?

I really think there is merit in a stable system like bert has because like he says the trainers are there to train the horses to provide the owners with the prize money.....so for them to stay in business they have to win...the only problem i have with berts system is the amount of bets...30+ bets a day is to much for me to handle...but if he wins in the end and his customers are happy well so be it....because if they were not happy they would not subscribe.....we all have our own ideas and i hope the day i post another one of my systems for your comments that you go easier on me than you have on bert.