Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 2nd May 2011, 04:37 PM
woof43 woof43 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 696
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
Thats strange.
I figured that a drop in weight is a clue to fitness.
And a rise in weight is due to lack of exercise , perhaps due to an injury.

No wonder I been losing so badly


I have said enough about weights previously, to go over it again.

and maybe my other post was misinterpreted, check the #1 it's past form. go back to its sixth start you will see it's comeback from a 2 month spell its last 5 starts are "different" to its start prior to the spell.(that tells me something about this dog)
Its last start it lead by how far down the back straight, yet reaching the top turn it was a shot duck, the the eventual winner and placegetters all nearly fell over themselves at the 1st turn.
To me this dog will be a classic dog of being "overbet" and judging by how you have read the form, thats how it will be..
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 2nd May 2011, 04:57 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woof43
I have said enough about weights previously, to go over it again.

and maybe my other post was misinterpreted, check the #1 it's past form. go back to its sixth start you will see it's comeback from a 2 month spell its last 5 starts are "different" to its start prior to the spell.(that tells me something about this dog)
Its last start it lead by how far down the back straight, yet reaching the top turn it was a shot duck, the the eventual winner and placegetters all nearly fell over themselves at the 1st turn.
To me this dog will be a classic dog of being "overbet" and judging by how you have read the form, thats how it will be..
OK
I know nothing about dogs, don't even kow how to find their weight for the current race, but I made good profits by analysing the available
form info on the TAB under "Form".

So, Cranbourne race 8 I'll have $20 on No.5. to win.

Even if it loses I'm still ahead by a fair margin today and I treat greys as a hobby.

PS anyone point me to the weight sheet? much appreciated.

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 2nd May 2011, 05:01 PM
woof43 woof43 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 696
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
OK
I know nothing about dogs, don't even kow how to find their weight for the current race, but I made good profits by analysing the available
form info on the TAB under "Form".

So, Cranbourne race 8 I'll have $20 on No.5. to win.

Even if it loses I'm still ahead by a fair margin today and I treat greys as a hobby.

PS anyone point me to the weight sheet? much appreciated.

Good luck

Good luck, too

Racing is my normal go too, but the dogs are the cream on top, they allow one to sharpen ones skills in race pattern prediction, and developing good wagering habits, the same methods employed with the dogs are the way to go with Racing.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 2nd May 2011, 05:02 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

http://www.grv.org.au/Statistics/WeightSheet.aspx

Can you briefly mention how you decided on #5 Lomaca, and why $20?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 2nd May 2011, 05:10 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woof43
Good luck, too

developing good wagering habits,
woof,
The tales I could tell about punters' wagering habits!
(don't ask, that business is behind us now praise be God)

Let it suffice that even a system that's losing by betting on every selection can be turned into a goldmine if good records are kept and sound betting is employed.

But you can't tell punters!!
The smart ones learn by listening and by experience.

Good luck to all
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 2nd May 2011, 05:13 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
http://www.grv.org.au/Statistics/WeightSheet.aspx

Can you briefly mention how you decided on #5 Lomaca, and why $20?
Thanks for the link.

moeee, my normal wager on horses is $200.

Greys being a hobby I though $20 is appropriate.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 2nd May 2011, 05:20 PM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
Hmmm.
If the #6 leads the Red to the First Turn, I'll be a deviate and eat his dump.



oh oh moeee...


6 DREWSTER 17.60 3.70
5 PURE PEACHES 1.80
2 AUTUMN BLING 2.60
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 2nd May 2011, 05:43 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
Greys being a hobby I though $20 is appropriate.

Cheers
OK the last one missed it by this " " much.

race 10 Cranbourne

Nos. 1 and 5 $10 each for win.

the pink might upset, but so what?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 2nd May 2011, 06:01 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stugots
oh oh moeee...


6 DREWSTER 17.60 3.70
5 PURE PEACHES 1.80
2 AUTUMN BLING 2.60


????
The RED led to the 1st turn by 3 lengths!!!!

LOMACA, you pick good.
But ain't it annoying when the #1 beat the Pink last time they met, yet in Race 10 , there was a Form Reversal of perhaps 10 lengths between them

Last edited by moeee : 2nd May 2011 at 06:01 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 2nd May 2011, 06:36 PM
Barny Barny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
Default

mooee "LOMACA, you pick good. But ain't it annoying when the #1 beat the Pink last time they met, yet in Race 10 , there was a Form Reversal of perhaps 10 lengths between them"

I have NO idea about the two races you're talking about, but it's not possible that there was a "form reversal" ..... doesn't happen that bad at the dogs. different distance (have to be 150 mtrs?) ..... not the track. Checked in the run (YUP). Bad box (again not 10 lengths). Yup ..... some of these could lead to 10 lengths (at the extreme) but NOT a form reversal !

mooee, you seem to take an interest in the dogs, I don't know the race, nor the dogs in question, so maybe you could provide some info as to how the difference was 10 lengths ..... and it wasn't a form reversal.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655