Yes Ocho its another slant thats worth perusing .

Well done and thanks for sharing your findings.

Like all systems on the forum, they are not set in concrete and are there to be pulled apart and improved upon.

I can see it working well on the UK Dogs because there are only 6 runners & the first 4 tend to dominate proceedings.

Their market is not usually formed until approx 20 secs till jump.

There prices are usually pretty good for this exercise.
For instance its very rare one finds a 2nd fav under 4.00
The Favs for instance are nearly always over 3.00 ,try getting that on an Aust Dog races and many Horse races for that matter.

Cheers.

__________________
Cheers.

Depends what you do, if you only change one factor then you are wasting your time. It will only change the "NR" value which is the total points added up, of course it will change the values in the changed column too but ranking will stay the same.

Being called "Neural" one would think that changing one factor would change all, but that is not the case.
I worked out how the individual setting are calculated and that is why I save ratings set at a uniform value and if I want to experiment I can change the setting.

Good luck

Bhagwan, I had a SIM loss of -$18.30 today using your criteria with 5 races and only one winning race.

There was a race there where the 2nd fav was picked 10 seconds out which turned into the first fave. Of course the first fave at the time (which ended second fave) won at $4.50. Swings and roundabouts there I guess.

I'm not so sure about this one (on the Aussie gallops at least). I'll let it run on the trots and Oz dogs tonight and see how it goes and, of course, I will try the UK dogs again tonight (it may have just been a fluke though last night).

__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale

Just tried those settings with the night time dogs and trots and lost 6 in a row making a loss of -$21.64 (got to a high of $14.36). Not looking good. I will test the UK dogs again to see if last night was a fluke or not.

__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale

So what your saying is it made a substantial profit one day & a small loss the next day & your in profit if both days added together 50-22= +28 profit
It don't work too good.
Hello! velcome to racing my friend.

Keep in mind that 1 unit is 6.00 as in amount per race so if down by $22.00
Thats only down by -3.7 units that's nothing.
Have a bank of 600.00 & go for it, have 100 shots at it.

You say it got to a high +14.00 then went backwards .
One could maybe stop once 2 lots of $6.00 is made = +12.00



So if the races are not being won by the 2nd-4th favs , what is winning all the races , surely its not the Fav every time or the rough heads.

If so, make the price filter for the 1st Fav higher.


Why don't you just fix it?

Try this race filter.
1st Fav 3.30+
2nd Fav 4.00+

Dogs
Horse races 1-11 runners .

Set Bot for 20 races.
Then STOP.

__________________
Cheers.

Of course you are right Bhagwan, a few days doth not make a summer. As a matter of fact a few months results may not mean anything.

I stopped the bot just before on the UK dogs on -$37.62. As you would say that is +12 up on the 2 days of that however it would of been stopped out overnight on -30 anyway (that's 20 up ).

I'm not sure who was winning all the losing races, all I know is it wasn't the 2nd, 3rd and 4th favs. But this goes along with what I was saying previously when tested on some of my (very limited) data - it's a bit up and down.

I'll leave it for someone else to test if they wish.

__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale

Being called "Neural" one would think that changing one factor would change all, but that is not the case.
I worked out how the individual setting are calculated and that is why I save ratings set at a uniform value and if I want to experiment I can change the setting.

lamaca, can you tell me how they calculate the TIM factor?

Do I understand this right? To get a true value on a particular factor you set all factors at '3', then increase or decrease the sole factor you are wanting to isolate?

Sorry for all these questions but you seem to have a great handle on these neurals.