|
|
|
This betting system wins!
Instantly check years of past results to create your own unique winning systems. Superb value database and software. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Crash,
Telstra has never paid anything like %17. Stick to punting on the TAB buddy where they rob you blind by excessive takeouts and rounding down. Hey Crash wanna know how to win a small fortune? If you keep using your figures the answer is. Start with a big one. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Legion,
I was told that was what Telsta paid. It was wrong ? Big deal. If you want to pull people up for a wrong quote on a stock divi. and for it to mean anything, you could try a stock market forum. I also said I didn't say I had any Telsta shares. You are reading one thing and "seeing" another ...whatever you want. Thats ok by me. Cheers. [ This Message was edited by: crash on 2003-08-29 17:01 ] |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Crash,
I used the Telstra example to show that you have a disregard for accuracy. I never said you actually owned any.In fact that was obvious by your %17 gaff.Your other assertions in this thread are similarly innacurate. Lets look at taking $1.70 and winning 7 out of ten times. This represents %19 profit on turnover assuming level stakes.Hardly peanuts. In fact in todays market which is much more accurate than 20 years ago it is an excellent result.I am certain your own figures are not that good.Especially if you are betting on the place tote as you mentioned.If ever there was a case for not taking unders the place tote is it. You also said that Lonhro won by a short half head when suggesting the race was an open affair. He won by almost half a length and was looked after in the last bit.After all it was his first assignment for the spring.The fact is the higher the class of horse the truer the form and these races are not usually as wide open as you suggest. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Legion,
If [other peoples] "accuracy" of opinion is an issue, what next? Peoples spelling [mine is terrible]? Some accuracy of your own then might not go astray. If you had have read all the threads in this forum here, you would know that I am not a place bet man. I have been trying an experiment for the past two weeks [1wx4p] as you would have seen by my last two Sunday's "for what it's worth" post and what I have written in other threads. That exercise is now over. As for having a go [ by obvious innuendo] at my strike rate, well my runs are on the board for all to see [and yours?]. Anyone who has the courage to posts tips here has nobody to answer to. Anyway, This forum is not a competion nor a place to have to prove any sort of accuracy in "meaning" to anybody. If I want to say 7 out of 10 odds-on bets are peanuts in my opinion [and those bets were over months I might add and that was the context of my point], then I can because {most] people realize that I am expressing my opinion only. You are free to disagree but only God has ownership of what is "accurate" opinion or what is the value of "peanuts" and if in "my opinion" Lonhro was unders and the race was open, then that is my opinion [and that of others too by the way including the Trainers foreman] and I am free to express it, arn't I? Our views all differ [thank God] and the forum needs no accuracy of opinion Policeman so I'll agree to disagree with you ok? We should also remember that this thread was created regarding the Warwick Stakes so if you feel so strongly about "accuracy" perhaps you should start you own thread on the subject. Cheers. [ This Message was edited by: crash on 2003-08-30 11:46 ] [ This Message was edited by: crash on 2003-08-30 13:07 ] |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|