Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #371  
Old 6th February 2013, 07:49 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Today's 22 selections were beaten for a profit of $145.76.
Reply With Quote
  #372  
Old 6th February 2013, 09:35 PM
TheSchmile TheSchmile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,051
Smile

Back in the black Michaelg.
__________________
The Schmile

"I buy when other people are selling.”
― J. Paul Getty
Reply With Quote
  #373  
Old 7th February 2013, 10:56 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Yes, TS, but it's still got $444 to make up for Tuesday's loss.

If I had started from day one (Friday 7 December) laying for the current $333 liability the method would now be in profit by $4,585. So at the moment I'm still somewhat hopeful even though a couple of quick accidents do put a dent in one's confidence and create some negative thoughts and expectations.

Today's selections:

Grafton
4/12
5/10
8/11, 13
9/13
10/10, 12

Seymour
2/2
3/9
8/9, 12

Sun Coast
4/5
5/9, 12
6/6
7/5, 9, 11

Pt Lincoln
7/7

Geraldton
3/3, 6
4/4, 10
7/5, 7
Reply With Quote
  #374  
Old 7th February 2013, 11:41 AM
TheSchmile TheSchmile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,051
Thumbs up

You're batting at a 98% SR Michaelg, 2 out of every 100 will be losses. Simple at the moment.

I noticed both the accidents were c or t/d winners. Something in that?

Great thread!
__________________
The Schmile

"I buy when other people are selling.”
― J. Paul Getty
Reply With Quote
  #375  
Old 7th February 2013, 12:02 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Thanks for your observation, TS.

I haven't paid attention to the selection's history apart from it's last start placing and if resuming now or at previous start, but as soon as I get the time I will do so and report back here.

It certainly would have saved Tuesday's two accidents but it may have prevented many smiles - even though it will be time consuming I have to check it out.
Reply With Quote
  #376  
Old 7th February 2013, 08:26 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

The Schmile, I've decided to omit any horse with a "C", "D" or "T" in its form. It will reduce the amount of selections but I don't think there would be too many of them that are $100-plus in D.S's market. However, one of them ran second today so that's convinced me. Better safe than sorry applies to the method because even one accident causes heart ache which takes some time to recoup.

A good day - from the 25 selection there were 25 Schmiles for a profit of $262.17.
Reply With Quote
  #377  
Old 7th February 2013, 08:52 PM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,410
Default

michaelg have you looked at laying the place as well?
Reply With Quote
  #378  
Old 7th February 2013, 09:26 PM
TheSchmile TheSchmile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,051
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelg
The Schmile, I've decided to omit any horse with a "C", "D" or "T" in its form. It will reduce the amount of selections but I don't think there would be too many of them that are $100-plus in D.S's market. However, one of them ran second today so that's convinced me. Better safe than sorry applies to the method because even one accident causes heart ache which takes some time to recoup.

A good day - from the 25 selection there were 25 Schmiles for a profit of $262.17.

Hi Michaelg,

I'd be interested in what percentage of the accidents were T, C or D?
__________________
The Schmile

"I buy when other people are selling.”
― J. Paul Getty
Reply With Quote
  #379  
Old 8th February 2013, 07:13 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Hi, Mark.

I Place layed the selections for only one day but I then stopped. I lost interest because Betfair unfortunately fielded (and still does) S.P. for the Place on major tracks only.

The Schmile, I've checked the accidents for "C'' "T" and "D".

There's been from day one a total of 1,802 selections for 34 accidents. Of these there have been 16 that come under the above form scenario - that is almost 50% of all accidents. I don't how many smiles this filter would have eliminated (none of the Maiden races) but I'd be surprised if it did not increase the strike rate and profit.

So from today I'm adding this as the "The Schmile" filter.
Reply With Quote
  #380  
Old 8th February 2013, 07:56 AM
SpeedyBen SpeedyBen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 464
Default

Michael and Schmile
A quick check of yesterday's fields shows that of 299 horses listed in the 3 east coast meetings there were 87 that had a C,D or T. About 29%.
Looks like a good decision to omit them.
Having said that I'm going to leave them in with a reduced liability to see how it affects the DS100 selections. I'll report back in a couple of weeks.
You've all done very well .............
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655