iamcool,

I just think that we will let other people on the forum work out what is going on, because dead set you have C O nfU zd me , no hang on , co nfoo Sd, no hang on, CCC OOO NNN FFF UUU SSS EEE DDD me. ( just had to ask my 9 year old daughter to help me out).
Just as a matter of interest I correspond with quite a few people from 2 forums privately, 2 who I will call my proteges, 1 from each forum are both making money of the punt for the first time in their life.
You ask why I bother when I am making very good money from the punt,
THE ANSWER IS ABSOLUTE TOTAL SATIFACTION AND IT GIVES ME A HIGH.
(Nearly better than coupling, NAH thats bull********)

I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this one.

I will say this though, thank the lord for philanthropic people such as yourself. I can't understand where you would find all the time. I mean running your empire, mentor to others less fortunate, i suppose you deliver meals on wheels and sing x-mas carrols to raise money in your spare time as well. Keep up the good work!

iamcool,

No I don't deliver meals on wheels, because delivery times interfere with the punt, ( but I do give to charities which I believe in like the Salvo's).
I DO sing xmas carols because it doesn't interfere with the punt ( unless I get good info on a dishlicker).
I have no empire and totally enjoy helping someone on the punt if I can.
I am not a bad judge of character and I think you have got the atitude of the majority, in that you cannot believe a person can succeed in their endeavours because you can't do it yourself.
I was being totally honest when I suggested lotto, Take that as you will.

Kenchar,
You're full of it - dead set. You espose the principles of helping your fellow man, those with less experience and knowledge than your know "f -all" self. I don't know a lot but i know enough to ask those who do, such as those on this forum and what's more i know this about you. You make unsubstantiated claims of success and wealth. You claim to have built this fanciful empire on the back of info, good info, reliable info you receive. Well i may not know much but i know the sound of **** when i hear it and Kenchar it is deafening. You claim to know me and my capabilities, well excuse me now but i nearly fell off my perch here in front of my computer. You are all talk mate.
You subscribe to threads re: Bhagwan and kiss his backside and then side with the very person who is slandering a suggestion he made earlier in the day.You are a grade A a-hole, of that i am certain. And should you need something to refresh your memory re-read the comments you made about me earlier today. Then after you have someone explain it to you, have a look at the subsequent comments made by your good buddy Angel on the other quinella thread re:Bhagwan.
http://forums.ozmium.com.au/showthread.php?t=10254
I seriously doubt if you do half the things you proclaim so readily to anyone stupid enough to listen.

Very helpful indeed.

Someone said:
If you take 1-2/3-4-5-6,YES!!!
If you take 1/3-4-5-6
2/3-4-5-6 NO!!!
You do NOT HAVE 1/2 coupled.

Let me have a try.

We have runners: 1,2,3,4,5,6
1&2 might come in, but 3,4,5,6 might also to.
I think it's:
1/3, 2,4,5,6
2/3, 1,4,5,6
Yes-No ?

3 is you next favoured runner to come 2nd or 1st,depending.

Jamcool,
It was never my intention to "slander" Baghwan on this thread or any other.It was not my intention to initiate a slanging bout between you and Kenchar either.If you wanted to cover the 1/2 combo as in Baghwans post it was not,you would have to take 1-2/1-2-3-4-5-6@1 unit=$12.
Quinellas have been my forte for some years now,and contrary to popular belief,there is value in them,BUT the best overlays lie in the 10/1 or less combos!
e.g 6/4 with 4/1 expected divvie is 3.3
6/4 with 5/1 e.d is 4.2

Usually these will pay overs because rank and file punters will not take them,they will take the 6/4 shot with the field hoping for a bolter to run 2nd.
This is where the value lies.What would you rather do?Have $20win on the 6/4 shot and collect $25 if it wins,or have $10 on each quinella combo and stand to make a far greater profit,even if the hotshot runs 2nd?Providing one of the others wins that is.Look at the results on Saturday out of 32 races on the 4 mainland states.The biggest divvie was $120.70,Rosehill R7.
Doomben R8 $86.40.The majority of all other races paid less than $20.

That was my only point in having a dig at Baghwan,the "motza" quins dont happen often enough,and you can bet your gonads when they do you wont be on!
That is also my point about betting to prices.
e.g.
If you took the 6/4 shot coupled with 7 other runners@ $1 cost $7
It wins and the 4/1 runs 2nd,you will lose!
To make money you MUST bet to prices.
Being selective is the first step,aka which races to bet.
The fav as your banker is a good way to go,IF you consider to be a genuine fav,they do win 30% of all races.
The other side of the coin I hear you say?they lose 70%,BUT how many times do they run 2nd?
I tried boxing,it just doesnt work.

As for Kenchar,we are not"buddies"but I used to enjoy reading his posts years back and I have no reason to doubt his claims.I dont see it as big noting or any reason for him to substantiate his claims.I certainly dont think he deserved your vitriolic attack.

As for Baghwan I intend to apologise and talk to him on the other thread.
cheers

Angel

I have no problem debating with you the various points of any topic as i see them as per yesterdays discussion. If, as you suggest, i am wrong in my interpretation then i am only too happy to learn it here on this forum rather than anywhere else.

However, you will find that if you or anyone else is arrogant enough to slander, bash or in any other way criticise the ideas of another simply to serve you own need to feel superior, then don't be surprised if someone else challenges you on that point. You took quite a swipe at not only me but other contributors to this forum and that my friend is a fact. Would you like to read some of your posts from yesterday again?

As for Kenchar, he is a big boy and can fight his own battles. If you or he describe me or anyone else in such a manner, as was suggested by him in yesterday's posts for what seems to be his own enjoyment, then i will have no hesitation explaining to you some of the finer points in life as i see them. If you can't handle that then i guess you will have to deal with those issues on your own time.

Other than that Angel, take care and i will look forward to reading more of your enlightening ideas.

iamcool,

You are correct in that I can fight my own battles.
As far as Angel is concerned I have no particular opinion one way or the other, I agree with some posts and disagree with others.
AS far as Bhagwan I take offence at what you implied I posted as you totally misconstrued the post.
I have total admiration for the man for the effort He puts into this forum.
I have corresponded with him privately and would never put Him down.
Maybe I was wrong in the way I had a shot at you, but do me a favour and read back over the thread and REALLY read what a couple of contributors were trying to convey to you, and your answers to what they were trying to convey was absolutely dumb and showed that you had no comprehention whatsoever what they were trying to convey, and believe it or not they were trying to give you good advice.
You seem to have the traditional tall poppy syndrome which sadly is prevalent in this country today.

Kenchar,

Excusing who said what to whom - i do not and can not agree with what you are saying re: yesterday's discussion. It may surprise you to note that i am not stupid and fully understand what is and was said to and about me. It will surprise you further to learn that i also understand what and how a quinella works!

Ultimately, i feel that it is you who either did not bother or was too arrogant to even consider what it was exactly i was trying to say - however misguided or incorrect i may have been.

I wish to bear no grudge towards you and i apoligise for causing offence with my "Vitriolic" post late last night. I am neither arrogant or stupid enough to think that i cannot learn from those who post on this forum - even you.

However should you or Angel feel the need to ridicule me or anyone else that requests information or makes an incorrect statement again i will not hesitate to give it to you with both barrels - so to speak.

All that said and done and barring any further comment you may feel is necessary in response i now wish to move on. Perhaps someone else with the knowledge and patience required to impart something worthwile is available to learn from. Cos i sure have had enough of this tripe.

Finally, i neither envy nor begrudge you any of your successes, in fact quite the opposite. You must of missed that during your three second pyschological profile you conducted on me last night.

angel417

If you don't mind and if it is not too much hassle, I just need to know if my question/answer is what you are trying to ask about the coupling factor ?
And anyone else for that matter if they could correct my suggestion if in error.

I don't want to get invloved in other discussions, so please, sorry for spoiling the show, I will not tolerate any other discussion except for the topic of this thread.
(You been warned)

Cheers and happier days !