Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Sports and Gambling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.
This betting system wins!
Instantly check years of past results to create your own unique winning systems. Superb value database and software.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 27th October 2005, 11:04 PM
wesmip1 wesmip1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
Default Some results...

All,

Here are some results from today :

Cessnock: 17 units bet, return of 35.7 units. Profit 110%
Bendigo : 8 units bet, return of 19.2 units. Profit 140%

I know that 25 bets is not enough to go off but I have only started testing this.
So far so good.

Good Luck
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 27th October 2005, 11:26 PM
kennedy22384 kennedy22384 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 52
Default

You know i have just realised if I scale each track and distance to a specific rating then there is no need to only pick races that are the same distance as all races will be scaled to today's race.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 28th October 2005, 07:49 AM
thebookie thebookie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 217
Default

Thanks for the email Kennedy.

All very interesting...
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 28th October 2005, 10:31 AM
kennedy22384 kennedy22384 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 52
Default

Ok i got the data i need to scale the dog's MPS by track and distance but it will not be easy and i will update on progress.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 28th October 2005, 05:22 PM
woof43 woof43 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 696
Default data

Once you have sufficent data, reprocess each dog's data take particular note of the correlation in the moving avg of each dogs stdev and the number of starts. This variation will give you an idea as to how dogs progress thru their racing career the same applies to horses.

After making the track adjustments to the data the LTD Stdev will become tighter or smaller.

Then your next step is to breakdown each dogs data by track, distance, Box etc and make slight adjustments to the LTD Mean an LTD Stdev based on sufficent data for each dog or by General analysis of the data.
Then run your MCsims once again, your next goal is to rank the dogs and make sure the MCsim probabilities Vs Actual stats are smooth, you don't need them to match the actuals just to have the same variations thru the probability bins

Once you have acheived the smallest variation possible your finished with doing anymore Handicapping...
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 28th October 2005, 06:12 PM
kennedy22384 kennedy22384 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 52
Default

I got my data and am now doing the odds by scaling the dog's mps by the track, distance and the box they were running from. The standard deviation is much smaller now. But the data I have will only suit victorian tracks, which isnt a worry for me cause victoria has many meetings (at least one per day).
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 29th October 2005, 12:46 AM
kennedy22384 kennedy22384 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 52
Default

I tried the slope and intercept but I also wanted to see the r squared that it would produce. The results were not good, r square was very low which mean the line does not fit very well so it is of no use.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 29th October 2005, 08:40 PM
woof43 woof43 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 696
Default

I know what you mean with the coefficient correlation, try testing each tracks distance combo's, I'm assuming your using Track records as the Fixed point of reference for each track and distance, which isn't the best, but its a good starting point.
You will quickly find distances where they may have been clocking something other then the dogs.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 30th October 2005, 05:58 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

WOOF43,are you rich?
I don't got a clue what your talking about.
It is a foreign language as far as I am concerned.
You must be rich!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 30th October 2005, 07:01 PM
kenchar kenchar is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 723
Default

You will quickly find distances where they may have been clocking something other then the dogs.[/QUOTE]
Woof,
No one on here will believe you that they sometimes clock the bunny, too many sceptics.

Moeee,
Check on how many runners Gilbert has now and how they finish.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 07:13 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655