Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 5th January 2008, 02:50 PM
Mr Quaddie Mr Quaddie is offline
Suspended. Invalid e-mail address.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 289
Default

Just for you, I got $500 a place on Randwick race 7 number 3 COME ON CUGAT
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 5th January 2008, 02:55 PM
King Cugat King Cugat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 326
Default

Hope thats winnings from your Xavier bet in the 1st << King Cugat sired.
or a bit from Spanish Kings place at Newcastle just before << King Cugat
The 1/2 brother to my 2yo Cugat is racing soon in Sandown >> Passing Salute
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 8th January 2008, 01:02 PM
King Cugat King Cugat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 326
Default

A Tip for Tuesday

Muswellbrook
Race: 6 n: 8 Fillatte

Good Luck
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 8th January 2008, 05:36 PM
King Cugat King Cugat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 326
Default

I have no doubt that as a 80% market driven 20% stat man for all this time i cant get my head around doing it the other way. I cant post bets on stats alone & succeed without the betting ring having a say. Other can i cant. That last race had Carnegie Prince get backed in from $4 > $2 in the ring. What stats can compete with that? Nobody in their right mind would bet AGAINST a fluc like that. Even Carnegie Prince came up a a bet on my own system.
SO there it is this trial system is being put to bed. It confirms my theory, to myself, that the market is a better indicator then the stats. Some stats i couldnt do without but there is a limit of just how many are a positive factor ....for me.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 8th January 2008, 06:13 PM
AngryPixie AngryPixie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by King Cugat
It confirms my theory, to myself, that the market is a better indicator then the stats. Some stats i couldnt do without but there is a limit of just how many are a positive factor ....for me.


No argument from me. The stats only tell us what we know, the market tell's us what we don't know.
__________________
Pixie
"It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 8th January 2008, 06:24 PM
King Cugat King Cugat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 326
Default

Quote:
No argument from me. The stats only tell us what we know, the market tell's us what we don't know.

100% Pixie 100% I like that quote >> a keeper. what i know but summed up nicely.

If i had the best stat man in the world standing next to me in the ring with a good thing, & on the otherside a bookie rolling a horse in from say...$3 > $2. i wouldnt even ask the stat man who he was refering to.
The $3 > $2.... the stats are somewhere in there anyway but so too is the trainers opinion, morning blood test, track work, fitness and all the things we just dont see in the form guide. So happens the things we dont see in stats are the important things.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 8th January 2008, 06:44 PM
Mr Quaddie Mr Quaddie is offline
Suspended. Invalid e-mail address.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 289
Default

I just find most of the time that the best backed runner never wins.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 8th January 2008, 07:44 PM
pengo pengo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 219
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Quaddie
I just find most of the time that the best backed runner never wins.


That sounds like a recipe for success in laying then!
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 8th January 2008, 10:45 PM
King Cugat King Cugat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Quaddie
I just find most of the time that the best backed runner never wins.

never?

If you take them all, the strike rate of them winning compared to odds would have you losing. The strike rate of them all placing compared to odds would have you losing. Its the ones you learn to not take that leave you with the margin.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 8th January 2008, 10:53 PM
Mr Quaddie Mr Quaddie is offline
Suspended. Invalid e-mail address.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 289
Default

How do you know which ones to leave alone?

The ones that halves its price inside the last 15mins are the ones worth backing right?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655