Without going outside the rules:

ASCOT [good track]
5/10,11 x
7/9 [27.20w 7.80p],10 [2.40p] Woo hoo!

Crash
I realise that the longshots that I backed were outside the published rules but I am appreciative nonetheless. I also ignore the 21 day rule myself and have a minimum acceptable price as well.
I accept what you say about the over 50/1 selections and will quit while i'm ahead with those.
In future, I won't mention any horse in this topic which is not a selection under your rules.

I really do think the 21 day rule is important [fit horses]. My bets are up to $5w now. Todays win went down really well.

I wouldn't have been on IP5, 8 which paid $25 today if I had applied the 21 day rule so i'm not yet convinced.

By the rules:

ASCOT
5/10,11 x
7/9 [27.20w 7.80p],10 [2.40p]
BALLARAT
5/11 x
7/14x

Any is free to make up their own I guess.

Crash
Should IP6/14 be on the list?

Crash
I think that's a pity but i think it's a good thing for this thread.
More money for you and me if the interest in it dies.
I expressed my appreciation of your efforts in more than one post and i didn't at any stage criticize your rules. I offered an alternative view on them which I thought was reasonable. I don't claim to be a guru but i do have lengthy experience in systems betting.
I certainly didn't intend to offend you.

No problems mate. We'll just let the thread slip quietly off the page.

Crash, we all make mistakes, I know I have sometimes in my postings here and feel terrible about it. And the problem is that how carefully we try not to make them we will all continue to do so because of the simple fact that we are human.

Maybe the only exception was a person who lived 2,000 years ago.

Crash, I wasn't intending to criticize either.
Thanks for lots of previous contributions and particularly this one that's in my suite of systems now as "Crash's System".
Regards.......Mancunian