Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #441  
Old 13th February 2013, 10:07 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Massive
...with what felt like a ridiculous number of favourites getting up.

Would love to know how Mark went today.

Regards,

Massive

21 of 50 got up today (42% SR).
Yesterday there were 9 from 20 (45% SR).

Thanks to sport of kings.
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale
Reply With Quote
  #442  
Old 13th February 2013, 10:28 PM
SpeedyBen SpeedyBen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinconpaul
Mate if you've won 89 LAYS out of the last 100 days at say $1 stake = $89 win. So does that also mean you had 11 losing days at average $25 per $1 stake = $275 loss or you had 1.5 losses at $25 = $37.50 loss. It's a bit unclear? Thanks for the insight.
Not sure if you meant to write 89 LAYS above. I actually wrote 89 DAYS out of last 100 DAYS. In that time I layed about 700 horses of which 11 won at an average price of $25. That should be pretty clear, I hope.
Reply With Quote
  #443  
Old 13th February 2013, 10:35 PM
SpeedyBen SpeedyBen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rinconpaul
I
If you layed all the other shortest price Neurals you would have had 18 Lay wins and 1 Back win = 95% Lay win strike rate. Almost as good as yesterday(100%) No rules required except if it matches Skyform don't Lay it.
In fairness to R&S if I reversed the scenario and Layed the best overall Skyform horse except when it matched the Neural, you had 24 races for 19 Lay wins = 79% Lay win strike rate.

NEURALS – Multi factor analysis of numerous stats and data to produce an overall mathematical Neural rating.

In fairness only 2 days data.
If you had simply coupled up the 2 shortest price neurals in each race today in a $10 quinella you would have won $960.
Out of interest was there a decent profit from the 41% winners?
Reply With Quote
  #444  
Old 13th February 2013, 10:49 PM
SpeedyBen SpeedyBen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 464
Default

Perhaps we should start a neurals thread instead of taking over Michael's DS thread?
Happy to do it if Michael wishes it to be.
Reply With Quote
  #445  
Old 14th February 2013, 06:09 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

SpeedyBen, no need to start a new (neural) thread. Please keep on posting here.
Reply With Quote
  #446  
Old 14th February 2013, 06:23 AM
Rinconpaul Rinconpaul is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
Default Laying Neurals update

When I reported in yesterday it was 5 o'clock and Ascot and Launceston hadn't run. That brought another 5 winners in for the Neural camp which meant 6 Back wins from 28 races after taking out Skyform favs. Not a good enough edge to Lay.

Interesting how in isolated areas, like TAS, No. 1 rated horses produced more winners. Reminds me of why the hi tech syndicates do so well in Hong Kong, only 2 racetracks and a limited number of horses to rate. Food for thought. Maybe if someone had the time, look at Win percentage of No 1 rated horses in Tas compared with the mainland?
Reply With Quote
  #447  
Old 14th February 2013, 08:57 AM
Rinconpaul Rinconpaul is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
Default MichaelG post mortum

Mate looking at the two horses that brought you undone yesterday, Executive Action, Ascot R8, was only having its 2nd start! Sacred Snaadee had dropped in class and they put a top hoop on board. It was a trainer's setup from the start! Had a kid on board in an Open last start, brought it back this time in a 0-71 Hcap and put a jockey on board with a near 48% strike rate for a place. This is what we're up against! I think your selection method is reasonable but once you get your shortlist have a look for anything sneaky.
Reply With Quote
  #448  
Old 14th February 2013, 09:55 AM
Massive Massive is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Default Feeling versus Fact

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ocho
Yesterday there were 9 from 20 (45% SR).


True.

I just notice them more when I am going backwards.

Brilliant work on the trading by the way.

Regards,

Massive
Reply With Quote
  #449  
Old 14th February 2013, 10:14 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Riconpaul, it was priced at $100 in Don Scott's market. However we applied a filter that no selection can have a T, D or C in its form, but a few days ago I decided to do away with this filter...look what happens!

And the other accident was having it's second career start - this is only the second time this has led to an accident, and I'm sure that including these selections are showing a profit because there have been many of them.

Thanks for your concern and observations.
Reply With Quote
  #450  
Old 14th February 2013, 11:11 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Today's selections:

Gosford
4/16

Seymour
2/6
3/7

Yeppoon
1/3, 7
2/1, 10

Bunbury
3/1, 10
4/8
5/11
8/3
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 01:10 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655