#441
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
21 of 50 got up today (42% SR). Yesterday there were 9 from 20 (45% SR). Thanks to sport of kings.
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.” ― Earl Nightingale |
#442
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#443
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Out of interest was there a decent profit from the 41% winners? |
#444
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Perhaps we should start a neurals thread instead of taking over Michael's DS thread?
Happy to do it if Michael wishes it to be. |
#445
|
|||
|
|||
![]() SpeedyBen, no need to start a new (neural) thread. Please keep on posting here.
|
#446
|
|||
|
|||
![]() When I reported in yesterday it was 5 o'clock and Ascot and Launceston hadn't run. That brought another 5 winners in for the Neural camp which meant 6 Back wins from 28 races after taking out Skyform favs. Not a good enough edge to Lay.
Interesting how in isolated areas, like TAS, No. 1 rated horses produced more winners. Reminds me of why the hi tech syndicates do so well in Hong Kong, only 2 racetracks and a limited number of horses to rate. Food for thought. Maybe if someone had the time, look at Win percentage of No 1 rated horses in Tas compared with the mainland? |
#447
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mate looking at the two horses that brought you undone yesterday, Executive Action, Ascot R8, was only having its 2nd start! Sacred Snaadee had dropped in class and they put a top hoop on board. It was a trainer's setup from the start! Had a kid on board in an Open last start, brought it back this time in a 0-71 Hcap and put a jockey on board with a near 48% strike rate for a place. This is what we're up against! I think your selection method is reasonable but once you get your shortlist have a look for anything sneaky.
|
#448
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
True. I just notice them more when I am going backwards. Brilliant work on the trading by the way. Regards, Massive |
#449
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Riconpaul, it was priced at $100 in Don Scott's market. However we applied a filter that no selection can have a T, D or C in its form, but a few days ago I decided to do away with this filter...look what happens!
And the other accident was having it's second career start - this is only the second time this has led to an accident, and I'm sure that including these selections are showing a profit because there have been many of them. Thanks for your concern and observations. |
#450
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Today's selections:
Gosford 4/16 Seymour 2/6 3/7 Yeppoon 1/3, 7 2/1, 10 Bunbury 3/1, 10 4/8 5/11 8/3 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|