#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() BENDIGO
6/13 x DUBBO 3/5 [7.90w 4.00p] 7/8 [$1.70p] MACKAY 5/8 [$4.60p] 8/12 x Someone might want to check these results. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I broke even today - thank god, I could use the money !
an oldie, but a goodie. Come on guys - aren't we all friends deep down with a common goal. cheers Mancunian |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hay, I'm partial to a little fancy fiddle playen.
I think our friend, now finally knows, what it feels like & why others have become cranky in the past, leave the site & never post a thing ever again. That's how sites become very quiet. There are some fools out there who say they do it just to get a gee-up out of people, as a form of weird joke, well no one ever laughs, except the sole, mouth breathing fool, just like a teenage bully does. There are also some who see themselves as some sort of policeman & beleive its their right to attack wild ideas in the name of protecting the average punter from losing all their money , yet never make a positive posting on how to make or protect the punting money to replace the idea, that they are attacking, no matter how wild & woolly the idea may be. My favourite, are the ones who go through all the postings & critisise others spelling & grammar- Weird! But never contibute anything positive about punting. I would personally like to see those who have felt they have been bullied into silence by the bullies, making their, valuable contributions known once more, no matter how wild the ideas may be . Dont let the bully boys get the upper hand , make it known to them that their nasty nonscence is offensive & you dont like . Maybe an official complaint to the moderator could be in order. Maybe the fool bully boys can laugh that one off aswell. Now, where's that fiddle of mine.
__________________
Cheers. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
did you actually back em this time or do you need to "I only realized I hadn't won on the horse after checking my betting account after you pointed out the mistake." again? this is hilarious |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yesterday elsewhere I experienced an incident which will occupy a prominent place in my burgeoning scrap book.
In response to an implication that I was incapable of comprehending flat staking, I calculated flat staking of a modest $1,000 over the disclosed 2,000 bets at 35% S/R and 35% POT. An eye-opening $700,000 profit. But that objective information was deleted, and today a Kelly Staking calculation met the same fate. This means that certain people there can claim any S/R or POT they choose and remain protected from my objective observations. Kinda' like those who pumped Davnet up to $3 billion before reality pricked. Now by contrast from what I can see here Crash published his picks beforehand, then claimed a winner that was not there. How can that be anything but an innocent oversight? If you want to malevolently claim fictitious winning figures, then you don't publish picks beforehand which everyone can verify. Instead you might just claim extravagant S/R + POT with no corroborating evidence, or go p57's celebrated route of having very fluid rules which only get disclosed after any long-shot bolts in. The massive outrage over what was clearly no more than a mistake again says far more about the accusers than the target. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yep, it just won - Sebring.
See.... I told you ![]()
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software. Now with over 413,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races! http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html *RaceCensus now updated to 31/01/2025 Video overview of RaceCensus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pointless being in a competition crash, as it doesn't reflect either the way I bet, nor the odds I take.
I'm not good at picking winners, I've always held that belief, my niche is punting to value, and laying poor value. My competitions don't have a start and an end, they are forever ongoing. Working out profit or loss using TAB dividends is like working out wages in India for me. If I can't get over or under a certain price, I pass. Sometimes I can't get the price, I'll trade on the race, knowing the ants will come out of the hill to feed and drive the market into a nice slice of profit. Give me a competition that works this way, and you have a serious challenge on your hands ![]() So far this week, I've more than doubled my bank on UK racing using 2% flat stakes to liability ![]() It's all about price I reckon.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software. Now with over 413,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races! http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html *RaceCensus now updated to 31/01/2025 Video overview of RaceCensus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() O.K. if you have no Betfair account we can't play, it really would have been fun, regardless of us having a go at eachother here.
It would have been a pretty good battle I reckon - it's a shame. The only rules were work out the profit per unit after a month and supply the Betfair account summary and csv file for verification. That was it - no other rules.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software. Now with over 413,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races! http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html *RaceCensus now updated to 31/01/2025 Video overview of RaceCensus here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chrome raises an interesting point for all punters.
That is... a punter has to ask himself the question, am I more intersted in hitting a winning profit or am I more interested in hitting a volumn of winners. Cheers.
__________________
Cheers. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think it's an interesting point too. Perhaps he should create a thread on it?
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|