Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61  
Old 11th April 2012, 07:44 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Hi Mg, good to see you are back on track with this.

Are you still placing with success, too?

I have had some success on this front as well of late, but find that rather than targeting a 'place chance' (if there is such a thing), it is more profitable to target the best value pick of the top chances - seems to bring home a reasonable place divi.


LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 11th April 2012, 09:27 PM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Hi Michaelg,
I have found with any high priced lay plan , that stronger results are to be had if one only targets races with 11+ runners.

Any less & anything can fluke a win.

Also try not to lay any runner that has not run before.
They have a habit of surprising.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 12th April 2012, 07:53 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Hi, L.G.

I no longer bet the Place method because my interest is dead at the moment, only focusing on Laying. But that may change.

Bhagwan, yes, the results are not too bad with the larger fields but the smiles produce only a very small profit.

However, since Sun 1/4 I've been closely looking at 11 and under fields because I'm strongly under the impression the value is better when laying outsiders in these smaller fields.

I'm using a method with only two filters. Since 1/4 there's been 122 smiles from 122 selections, and only one smile ran third. My bets have become quite large and am profiting between $50 and $100 per day. The only drawback is that I have to be at the computer.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 12th April 2012, 09:11 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Thats great if you have found a filter that seems to work.

That's a pretty good test so far.

Especially being <=11 runners

The average price will usually be more attractive, due to being a smaller field.

I usually like to see these stats in groups of 150 bets, so as to have a broader picture.

Another rule that I find that works well with this idea ...
Min price has to be >= 5.00
Because sometimes they can end up being 1st or 2nd Fav in live market, then go on to win.

So far, it appears to be producing some fine results.


Can you say at this stage Michaelg what the filters are?
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 12th April 2012, 10:08 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Bhagwan, at this time I'd prefer not to reveal them. - sorry. However if they continue to perform and you are still interested I'll give you the rules privately.

It currently has a 100% success rate in the U.S. and U.K but because of the rules it makes it somewhat difficult to identify the selections, and I have to make an "educated " guess.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 12th April 2012, 12:00 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Out of interest, laying yesterday's twelve selections for a liability of $33 produced a profit of $8.00. And backing them for $1.00 on Unitab also produced a profit, of $10.40

Today's selections are:

Ballarat
5/8
6/1
8/15

Hawkesbury
5/4

Sun Coast
2/9
3/4
7/10

Kalgoorlie
1/1
3/3
4/13
7/3
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 12th April 2012, 12:23 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Kalgoorlie 7/3 is scratched. The replacement selection is no.1.
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 12th April 2012, 07:14 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Not a bad day. There were 10 smiles from 11 selections for a profit of $26.12.
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 13th April 2012, 11:26 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Today's selections are:

Canterbury
5/12
7/8

Cranbourne
3/7
6/8

Geelong
8/5

Ipswich
5/5

Canberra
2/10
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 13th April 2012, 09:26 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

A losing day. There was an accident from the 7 selections for a loss of $11.24.

After three days there have been 26 smiles from 30 selections for a profit of $22.88.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:38 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655