Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 22nd November 2012, 09:23 AM
Vortech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryPixie
None. Firstly salesman would also need to provide the average starting price of all selections for each product. There's not enough information to work out your advantage.

In theory assume all the same starting prices.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22nd November 2012, 09:27 AM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

.. and that the Salesman provides a complete run down of the system at the initial appointment - follow up report ?

The minimal info above being the teaser to create an appointment? If this was the aim, might need more lolly = promise / benefits etc to initiate the conversation !

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22nd November 2012, 09:39 AM
Puntz Puntz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 291
Default

D? make an offer to the rep he cannot refuse. What the offer in content may be is not necessarily money, a barter or swap deal.
Prereference A for a list of prospective buyers !
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22nd November 2012, 10:54 AM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puntz
D? make an offer to the rep he cannot refuse. What the offer in content may be is not necessarily money, a barter or swap deal.
Prereference A for a list of prospective buyers !


I like it Puntz. Workable on the net too, me thinks.

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22nd November 2012, 03:03 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vortech
I'm trying to gather ideas around peoples thoughts on reducing profit on turnover over reducing filters

Another example
If you have 10,000 bets and made $1000 profit with 8 rules

Or if you had 25,000 bets and made $1000 profit with 6 rules.

Would you prefer the same return on investment with less rules or more interested in POT

$1000 profit on 25,000 bets is still with random variance for a system.

But based of what your trying to achieve its more of a balancing act. The profit in relation to the number of bets is important. Its relation to the number of rules is irrelvant. I could have a system that has 1 rule and make $1000 profit on 100K turnover but thats not a good thing. But also a $1000 profit on 100 selections may not be a good thing either if its based on 10 rules and looks at long shots.

People would also need to know

a) strike rate
b) average price of selections
c) average price of winners
d) where the odds are taken from (tab, betfair, etc).
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 23rd November 2012, 08:39 AM
Puntz Puntz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 291
Default

Ok, so back into the sale inventives, if there was a option D, where let's say 100 prospective buyers are listed and handed over to this sales rep.
Out of 100, 20 may show interest, out of 20 5 may contact and of the 5, 1 may or may not buy system A,B, or C, or D/incentives
The rule is, cannot receive a chosen system freely, until a buyer from 100 names buys with actual money.
So if get 300 names, and 3 buyers, eventually i would have had a chance to score all 3 systems, correct?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 23rd November 2012, 09:05 AM
Vortech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Are you sure your not in real estate?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 23rd November 2012, 09:28 AM
Puntz Puntz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 291
Default

No, not into real estate, it's percentages. 100,80,20,5,1 and a strategy.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 23rd November 2012, 10:26 AM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,456
Default

Gees if you are going to buy 1 i would just buy all 3 and make a portfolio, if 1 has a lean trot you have the other 2 to back you up.
__________________
One Drive

"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out."
--moeee
_______________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 23rd November 2012, 01:09 PM
Puntz Puntz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 291
Default

See, shaun is the rare 1 percent, he buys all 3 systems and plays his 33.33333 percent strategy with his A B or C systems.
Therefore i get my commission as having referred Shauun
of three systems, A B and C, which he purchased.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:12 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655