tinkering with this one a bit you guys can may be improve it ?
1/ last start 3rd>
2/must have won 1 of the previous 2 starts to the last 1
3/must not have more than 2 places in last 3 runs ie. 314 153 615 ect.
4/likely unitab sp. 4<

oh my goodness

ok lack of replys maybe means you guys think im on the wrong planet
or im on the wrong track
they were not meant to be rigid rules , im now thinking maybe price maybe
a bigger factor here
maybe 3<

my point being maybe its best not to lay anything

best just to aaaa it

Johnp1


Experience has told me that apart from a small handful of forumites, there's very little interest in laying systems and methods on this site. Sorry don't have any useful input into your rules. All the best.

__________________
Pixie

"It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash

ok . i believe this one is a winner
1/ likely sp . 4 or lower
2/the runner will have the most starts at the track
3/how big are your balls,,,,,,coz there are some beautys
4/thank me later

I've been cleaning up with that idea John.
Well done.
Thanks for sharing your findings.

Cheers.

__________________
Cheers.

yes indeed bhagwan as i have

and reverse this for trots ie today
vt1x
nt1 5.10
vt 2 7 x
nt2 5 2.08
nt3 8 3.40
vt4 10 2.22
nt4 7 4.90
those were what i got matched on bet fair

scrap the trots thing thats to hit and miss
but whilst on the lay subject here is ..and i think it is a reasonablly good thing
i use racing odds coz the print is easy to read at a glance
1/ there must be at least 2 openers at odds of 4 or less
2/your lay will be the nag with the most runs at the track
3/must be more than 1 run at the track