Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > General Topics
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #81  
Old 22nd June 2014, 09:19 AM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

In the audio interview posted above they talk a bit about account closures & that it is an issue that needs to be addressed along with the min bet limits etc.

Surely there must be some consumer rights being violated with the current approach being taken by the corps - odd's are publicly advertised (for sale) but when certain customers decide to take those odds either they cannot 'buy' them at the advertised price or can only 'buy' them in such small amounts as to make the exercise pointless - when I buy a bag of peanuts at Wollies, I rightfully expect to be able to buy the whole bag, not have the checkout chick open the bag, empty 9/10ths into her pocket & hand me whats left when I go to pay.

& one thing I have never had happen is an on-course bookie reduce the odds on a horse after I have claimed those odds so I do not see why it is considered a fair practice for online corps to do so. Either the odds we see are truly available or else it is false advertising & must be a violation of consumer law.

As discussed in the interview, there should be legitimate reasons for account closures, fraud, multiple accounts etc.

Last edited by stugots : 22nd June 2014 at 09:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 22nd June 2014, 11:39 PM
FredTheMug FredTheMug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 102
Default

I wonder if these new minimum limits by Racing NSW are really just a disguised way to break the exchange model in Australia. Because, on Betfair, not everyone will be able to get on at the advertised price to win the minimum amount set by Racing NSW.

Depending on the wording, Betfair might be able to get around it by seeding it's markets at $1.01/$1000.

Surely the ACCC would protect Betfair if anything came to head.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 23rd June 2014, 06:47 AM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stugots
In the audio interview posted above they talk a bit about account closures & that it is an issue that needs to be addressed along with the min bet limits etc.

Surely there must be some consumer rights being violated with the current approach being taken by the corps - odd's are publicly advertised (for sale) but when certain customers decide to take those odds either they cannot 'buy' them at the advertised price or can only 'buy' them in such small amounts as to make the exercise pointless - when I buy a bag of peanuts at Wollies, I rightfully expect to be able to buy the whole bag, not have the checkout chick open the bag, empty 9/10ths into her pocket & hand me whats left when I go to pay.

& one thing I have never had happen is an on-course bookie reduce the odds on a horse after I have claimed those odds so I do not see why it is considered a fair practice for online corps to do so. Either the odds we see are truly available or else it is false advertising & must be a violation of consumer law.

As discussed in the interview, there should be legitimate reasons for account closures, fraud, multiple accounts etc.


Have been all the way to the Discrimination Board stugots......they didn't want to know. It seems, at the moment, that punters have no rights. Unfortunately I cannot see this changing.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 23rd June 2014, 05:00 PM
Pat123 Pat123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 323
Default

Monday, 23 June 2014

Minimum Bets For Punters – Consultation Progress

Racing NSW last week continued the consultation process in respect of a Minimum Bet Limit requirement for bets placed on NSW races with Licensed Wagering Operators. The new condition will require the wagering operators to stand a horse to lose a minimum amount on a single fixed odds wager on NSW Thoroughbred races.
During the week of Monday 16th June to Friday, 20th June 2014, open consultation was undertaken with all licensed wagering operators and their representative bodies. Punters were also interviewed about the situation as it stands now and ideas exchanged re the introduction of the new requirement.
The wagering operators that were consulted included:
TABS:
• Tattsbet Limited as operators of Tattsbets Queensland, Northern Territory TAB, South Australian TAB & Tote Tasmania,
• ACT TAB Ltd - Canberra
• Tabcorp Holdings Pty Ltd as operators of TAB Limited NSW & TABCORP Wagering Victoria
• Racing and Wagering Western Australia (RWWA)
CORPORATE BOOKMAKERS:
• Sportsbet Pty Ltd,
• William Hill Pty Ltd as operators of Sportingbet , Centrebet & Tom Waterhouse NT
• Unibet Pty Ltd as operators of Betchoice
• Ladbrokes Digital Australia
• Hillside Pty Ltd as operators of Bet365
• Tabcorp Holdings Pty Ltd as operators of Luxbet
• Beteasy Pty Ltd
• Merlehan Bookmaking -TopSport
• Sportsbetting.com.au
• AWC - Australian Wagering Council - the representative body for its Corporate Bookmaker members
BETTING EXCHANGES:
• Betfair Australia Pty Ltd
BOOKMAKERS:
• ABA - Australian Bookmakers Association (on behalf of all licensed On-Course bookmakers who are members of their applicable State Co-operative or Association)
Racing NSW is considering the verbal submissions and ideas put forward in the consultation meetings by wagering operators and Punters. The consultation process is still ongoing and final confirmation of the minimum bet conditions will be published when all views and submissions have been considered by Racing NSW. All those that attended meetings have been invited to follow up with a written submission or additional ideas not canvassed in the meetings.
Any other interested parties who would like to make a submission or have their ideas considered should please make their submission in writing to - rf@racingnsw.com.au - by 5pm on Wednesday, 25 June 2014.


Source: http://www.racingnsw.com.au/default...isplay&id=15922
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 24th June 2014, 07:51 PM
Pat123 Pat123 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 323
Default

Hi Mark,

Thanks for sending that through. Does this mean bookmakers currently are still entitled to ban myself and others from Fixed Odds? Do i have to wait a bit longer before they will take my bets, and more importantly, what rights do i have with regards to them getting around this new rule by closing my accounts?

Ladbrokes found out about this rule and straight away closed my account!

Regards



Hi Pat,

Probably just a matter of watching this space (i.e. our website).

The consultation submissions close tomorrow afternoon so will probably have more news after it’s all been digested by the relevant parties.


Regards,

Mark Brassel
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 25th June 2014, 07:06 AM
Michal Michal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,007
Default

Hi All,

Obviously we are watching the situation unfold, holding our breath (and turning blue). Part of my submission:

Closing of accounts:

One way to not take any bets from a winning punter is to close his account; this circumvents the whole process. Unless fraudulent behavior is detected bets should be accepted and accounts should not be permitted to be closed.

Fixed prices / products on offer differ between clients:

Another way to circumvent the intent of this legislation would be to offer substandard odds or products. In this case the punter would not make the bet. One version of a product / odds should be available to all clients as advertised on the bookmakers website without being logged in (and discriminated against based on punters winning performance).

Our industry is one where people aspire to become winning punters, people do not come to the races with the intent to loose. The current practice of risk management by bookies where they eliminate winning punters fosters the decline of interest from existing and new clients to our industry.


To which the reply was short but very promising:


Dear Michal,

Thank you for your submission. The new Condition does include a clause to curb closure of accounts and restriction on clients’ accounts

Yours Sincerely,

Clare Wilson

Race Fields and Wagering Supervisor
__________________
Michal - Ratings2Win Pty Ltd
R2W Axis - Axis is Australia's leading horse racing software and database;
with sophisticated form analysis tools and accurate horse performance ratings for TAB meetings.
http://www.ratings2win.com.au/
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 25th June 2014, 11:30 AM
garyf garyf is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 366
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michal
Hi All,

Obviously we are watching the situation unfold, holding our breath (and turning blue). Part of my submission:

Closing of accounts:

One way to not take any bets from a winning punter is to close his account; this circumvents the whole process. Unless fraudulent behavior is detected bets should be accepted and accounts should not be permitted to be closed.

Fixed prices / products on offer differ between clients:

Another way to circumvent the intent of this legislation would be to offer substandard odds or products. In this case the punter would not make the bet. One version of a product / odds should be available to all clients as advertised on the bookmakers website without being logged in (and discriminated against based on punters winning performance).

Our industry is one where people aspire to become winning punters, people do not come to the races with the intent to loose. The current practice of risk management by bookies where they eliminate winning punters fosters the decline of interest from existing and new clients to our industry.


To which the reply was short but very promising:


Dear Michal,

Thank you for your submission. The new Condition does include a clause to curb closure of accounts and restriction on clients’ accounts

Yours Sincerely,

Clare Wilson

Race Fields and Wagering Supervisor


Will run you through a typical scenario that happens to me,
Re the fixed odds being displayed for all & sundry but when,
A winning punter (account not closed) wants to get a bet on.

Horse =A Current fixed odds showing $9.0 for everyone to bet.
Winning punter rings up (I have to bet on the phone with this corporate)

After giving my account details I ask for $500.00 on horse =A at $9.00,
Silence for a few seconds as my account details come up then the spiel.

I'm sorry "GARYF but we have laid that horse substantially early on,
And we don't want to risk that amount at those odds.

2 X scenarios are now offered to me.

I can have the $500 on at a drastically reduced price,
Or $20.00 on at the current $9.00.

They have refused my bet, but hopefully the rule is invoked,
That all bookmakers have to be bet to lose a certain amount I wonder,
If it will cover the above scenario, or just another way out for them.

Cheers.
Garyf.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 25th June 2014, 12:00 PM
garyf garyf is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 366
Question

What I should have explained is this.

Technically they have bet me the fixed odds of $9.00.

Also they have let me on for the rest of my bet.

So they have fulfilled both obligations haven't they?
But in a round about way that if invoked this rule,
Of betting all punters the price on offer to lose a set amount,
Would have to be re-worded in this scenario.

Bet all punters to lose a set amount at the fixed odds displayed,
For the "EXACT" amount the punter asks for providing that amount,
IS NOT EXCEEDED RE THE RULES GOVERNING THAT PRICE
AND RULE PERTAINING TO WHERE THE MEETING IS HELD.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 25th June 2014, 12:01 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,365
Default

So what will happen?

One of two things.
Either they will not cover NSW racing or offer substandard odds to ALL clients.
Top fluctuation will be removed and you'll be offered 130% markets like the QLD bookies. Can see it as plain as day.
They will have no arbers at all because the odds are so poor, and only the mugs will take the really poor prices.
Of course there will be all these new types of bets I'd imagine, where you lay the favourite vs the field at double the Betfair odds etc. Seen this creeping in already.

There is no way in this world that they are going to allow winning punters back on for set amounts at current prices - sad but true.

Online bookies are the new "Wiggles". Guaranteed.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 399,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/03/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 25th June 2014, 12:36 PM
Michal Michal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,007
Default

I see it a little more rose-colored.

With NSW having this legislation in, other states will follow. Removing the ability to not cover meetings in the 'unfavorable' jurisdiction.

Regarding the bad odds and abandoning of the best punting products (remember that these are only available to loosing or small temporarily winning clients) well the market pressure should dictate, no one will bet on a bad price if better is elsewhere, and they all cant collude and offer the same bad price.

Remember that there are bookies that offer the real deal to punters already so it isn't like its all online/of-course bookies just have it their way. So their option may be to do form and be a bookie other then the accountants they are now or pack up as they wont be meeting turnover targets .....

Wishful thinking may be, but the market will sort itself out and if there is just a little justice and it isn't all one way like it is now, things will improve at least to some degree.

Although I do agree that the corps will be trying to have their present cash-flows (CASH-COWS) undisturbed.
__________________
Michal - Ratings2Win Pty Ltd
R2W Axis - Axis is Australia's leading horse racing software and database;
with sophisticated form analysis tools and accurate horse performance ratings for TAB meetings.
http://www.ratings2win.com.au/
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655