Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > General Topics
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 9th August 2013, 07:30 AM
Puntz Puntz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 291
Default question for advanced mathmaticians

Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution

In regards to the Poisson probability function in Excel which is for example
=POISSON( 1.5, 1.5, FALSE )
will show 33% if formatted to percent.

Does this formula conclude,or give further weight to the common rule of thumb that favorites win 33% of the time ?

One can play around with the 1.5, 1.5 and obtain some interesting figures.

My other question is, out of the 1.5,1.5 entry, which of the 2 is the bookie and the punter, the left or the right?

I was also thinking, if my assessed odds are 1.5 and the bookie is 1.5 ironically as well,
does this mean the formula is saying there is a 33% chance winning?

Other examples
=POISSON( 2.5, 1.5, FALSE ) = 25%
=POISSON( 1.5, 2.5, FALSE ) = 21%

Can someone explain this is plain English please.

Thanks

Last edited by Management : 9th August 2013 at 11:36 AM. Reason: request
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 9th August 2013, 08:32 AM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puntz
Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution

Can someone explain this is plain English please.

Thanks
Sadly I can't, but I will say this. Favorites win 33% of the time overall or thereabouts because of 1 factor imho - the very thing which is present in every race, meeting, racetrack, region, country, on every day of the week and any state of going.

Human nature

Coming back to your query, how good would it be to nail the 'maths' at this level and therefore be able to crack any number puzzle that comes our way, winning favorites included? My thoughts are that it is much simpler than an equation or statistical concept or method, all the complexity still present in the underlying answer however - something to be observed but not explained with the technology and wisdom we have to hand at present!

An initial filter or lens through which to look, perhaps?

LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10th August 2013, 09:44 PM
beton beton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 589
Default

Oh to know when to bet in the high and sit in the low. There in lies the Holy Grail of Punt.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11th August 2013, 07:07 AM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,517
Default

Puntz I think you are a bit confused on how to use the POISSON calculation.

I will say I am not a trained statistician but I am self taught and have a better understanding then the average person.

The poisson distribution in excel is as per your post :

=POISSON( X, Y, Z )

X = Value to be tested
Y = Our Predicted Value
Z = cumulative effect (We always want FALSE).

So based on what I read you had a rating of 1.5. When you do this calculation:

=POISSON( 1.5, 1.5, FALSE )

You are basically asking "I came up with a rating of 1.5, what percentage of time is this rating correct ?". In your case it replied that your only going to get your rating correct 33% of the time.

Now you just need to work out how this can be of use in your ratings. Perhaps it would work well to find the range where your rating is likely to be correct. Perhaps its of no use at all.


In regard to your original questions:



Quote:
Does this formula conclude,or give further weight to the common rule of thumb that favorites win 33% of the time ?

Well it adds some weight to the argument if we assume the first number is the publics odds (their guess at the horses chances of winning) and the second is the real chance of the horse then the punters are getting the odds right for a $1.50 chance around 33% of the time. But of course the would get it above and below this number just as often and therefore give rise to the fact that they get the favourite right about 33% of the time.

Quote:
My other question is, out of the 1.5,1.5 entry, which of the 2 is the bookie and the punter, the left or the right?

If depends what your trying to figure out. If your trying to figure out how often the bookie will match your odds then the bookie is first. If your trying to figure out how often your rating will be 1.5 when the bookies is 1.50 then your the first number.

Quote:
I was also thinking, if my assessed odds are 1.5 and the bookie is 1.5
ironically as well,
does this mean the formula is saying there is a 33%
chance winning?

No. Its saying the probability of you getting the same rating as the bookie is 33%. Its not telling you the chance of it winning.

Does that help ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11th August 2013, 07:25 AM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,517
Default

You might still be confused after reading my post. I tried to say it in plain English as good as I could but statistics are not an easy area to understand without a lot of study.

So after reading my post you are probably going to go ... ****** ? How do I use this for making money in gambling ?

Well the only areas I know of that it is extensively used is prediction in football scores. Here is an example http://www.bettingexpert.com/blog/h...-poisson-part-2

But here are some ideas where statistics might help you with ratings and punting in general:
- Find confidence intervals for your ratings
- Find your edge using chi tests
- Using distributions to model your odd distributions.
- Using distributions to model your profit distributions
- Using distribution on odds vs finishing position to determine likely finishing chances.
- Using distribution of your rating to finishing position to likely determine finish position.

The list could go on forever. If I had to decide on what I concentrate on if I was you I would look into is understanding the confidence level of each of your ratings and coming up with a "ratings range" for each horse. If you find you rated a horse 20% and you find standard deviation is 5% then your rating of 20% is really a rating range of 15%-25%. You could come up with 1 std dev ratings and 2 std deviations ratings.

If you do this you would then have a rating system that says :

Horse A : Predicted 20% chance of winning, but range 15%-25%. (5% deviation)
Horse B : Predicted 50% chance of winning but range 38% - 62% (12% deviation).
Horse C : Predicted 30% chance of winning but range 23% - 37% (7% deviation).

Looking at the above you could be fairly certain Horse B is going to win. Its lowest rating is 38% and the highest possible rating of any other horse is 37%. The overlaps is where you are going to be able to identify the races where the favourite is likely to lose or the field is so close its too hard to pick a winner.

Hopefully someone gets something out of this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12th August 2013, 08:41 AM
Puntz Puntz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 291
Default

UB, your first reply made sense.

"Predictive Modeling"

Where you quoted
Quote:
You are basically asking "I came up with a rating of 1.5, what percentage of time is this rating correct ?". In your case it replied that your only going to get your rating correct 33% of the time.


How did this get discovered, is recently there is a book that has just come out. Poisson was mentioned.
In that book's book review it has a quote, "the Poisson advantage is good arsenal for any serious gambler", or words to that effect.

I have ordered the book....more to be revealed.

Lord Greystoke and beton, thanks also.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12th August 2013, 03:02 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puntz
UB, your first reply made sense.

"Predictive Modeling"

Where you quoted


How did this get discovered, is recently there is a book that has just come out. Poisson was mentioned.
In that book's book review it has a quote, "the Poisson advantage is good arsenal for any serious gambler", or words to that effect.

I have ordered the book....more to be revealed.

Lord Greystoke and beton, thanks also.

Its definitely useful in the right situation. Especially for determining the "error" rate in your ratings.

Whats the book called ? can you provide a link ?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th August 2013, 04:26 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Talking

Strewth.
And to think they closed MY mathematical System down.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12th August 2013, 11:21 PM
Puntz Puntz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 291
Default

Conquering Risk: Attacking Vegas and Wall Street
by Elihu D. Feustel (Author)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 13th August 2013, 05:05 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,517
Default

thanks.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655