Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #601  
Old 6th March 2013, 12:28 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Thanks, UB.

Today's selections ($999)

Newcastle
4/14, 15
5/14

Sandown
5/12

Eagle Farm
1/20
4/3
5/12

Gawler
3/7, 10, 11
5/2

Ascot
1/16
7/14
8/5, 16, 17
Reply With Quote
  #602  
Old 6th March 2013, 05:07 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,474
Default

looking good so far today.
Reply With Quote
  #603  
Old 6th March 2013, 05:30 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Yes, UB.

With two more races to go it's a touch over $185 in profit.
Reply With Quote
  #604  
Old 6th March 2013, 08:47 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

A good day - from the 16 selections there were 16 smiles for a profit of $206.16.
Reply With Quote
  #605  
Old 7th March 2013, 07:23 AM
Rinconpaul Rinconpaul is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
Default Michael, can you check this please

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelg

If from day one (7 Dec) I had bet a liabilitiy of the current $999 the method would be slightly over $13,000 in profit...so I'm hopeful. And it gives me a rush with the high liability.

There's been 2,396 smiles from 2441 selections for a 98% strike rate.
2441 - 2396 = 45 losses Therefore 45 x 999 = $44955 loss. Add to this the $13000 nett profit you made over and above this loss = $57955 nett turnover. Divide this by 2396 smiles = $24.18 nett profit per bet ($999 liability) Add commission to that as I assume your $13000 profit was after commission = $25.86 . Average odds then 39:1.
Your average return per bet of $24.18/$999 is markedly more than the Speed-E-Ficiary system return of $18.06(as of yesterday).
That's excellent!
Cheers RP
Reply With Quote
  #606  
Old 7th March 2013, 09:20 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Thanks, RP.

Because of the interest you've now created I've double-checked the results.

Laying for a $33 liability there have been (including the five days of testing period) 1674 selections for 1706 smiles for a profit of $431. If layed for the current $999 liability then the profit would have been approximately $13,000.

Laying for a $333 liability there have been 755 selections for 739 smiles for a profit of $2,040. If layed for the current $999 liability then the profit would have been approximately $6,000.

Laying for a $999 liability there have been 137 selections for 134 smiles for a loss of $690.

I must admit there was a close-call yesterday with Newcastle 6/12. The filter that prevented it from becoming an accident was that it was equal-fourth in the Unitab rankings.
Reply With Quote
  #607  
Old 7th March 2013, 10:18 AM
Rinconpaul Rinconpaul is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 755
Thumbs up Too Good MG

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelg
Thanks, RP.
Laying for a $33 liability there have been (including the five days of testing period) 1674 selections for 1706 smiles for a profit of $431. If layed for the current $999 liability then the profit would have been approximately $13,000.

Laying for a $333 liability there have been 755 selections for 739 smiles for a profit of $2,040. If layed for the current $999 liability then the profit would have been approximately $6,000.

Laying for a $999 liability there have been 137 selections for 134 smiles for a loss of $690.
From the revised figures, if you started with a $999 liability on the 7th Dec till now (3 month anniversary today!) you would have made $18,478 profit! Well done.
Cheers RP
Reply With Quote
  #608  
Old 7th March 2013, 12:36 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

Thanks, RP. If from day one the current filters had been applied I hope/expect the profit could have been better.

Today's selections ($999):

Wyong
5/3, 4, 16

Ballarat
1/8, 10
2/1, 4, 5
3/5

Beaudesert
1/14
3/7, 11
5/6, 9, 15, 17
7/8

Bordertown
3/11, 12
5/4
6/12

Pinjarra
1/2, 3, 8
4/4, 8, 9
5/3, 4, 5, 12
9/10

Last edited by michaelg : 7th March 2013 at 12:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #609  
Old 7th March 2013, 01:56 PM
TheSchmile TheSchmile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,051
Lightbulb T,C,D,W filters

Hi Michaelg,

I had an idea that it may be prudent (when you have a spere few hours/a day) to go over all selections with T,C,D,W in their form line.

I was thinking that even though they cause more accidents, it doesn't matter so long as they're losing at level stakes when laying.
__________________
The Schmile

"I buy when other people are selling.”
― J. Paul Getty
Reply With Quote
  #610  
Old 7th March 2013, 03:34 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink

TheSchmile.

I did look at this at around the time you originally suggested these Form Filters. I did not persue it so I have to assume the filter was worthwhile, and I am also under the impression it increased the strike rate.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:25 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655