Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > General Topics
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 3rd June 2014, 11:00 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,365
Default

This is all really puzzling.
Of course Betfair revenue is up, they are covering more races, trots and greyhounds than they ever have and added more inplay options on those races.
Then they have increased premium charges and levies.
Revenue is not profit.
Any company that reports revenue rise is playing smoke and mirrors to it's shareholders.

Revenue minus total expenses is profit.

Liquidity is down, both here and in the UK, the gaps between back and lay prices and market percentages in all but the last two minutes tell the story.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 399,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/03/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 4th June 2014, 09:03 AM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

& yet BF still provides on average the best prices if you are a backer, & the option to lay if that floats your boat. & do not ban.

Maybe BF is slowly but surely going down the gurgler, maybe not, will worry about it when I wake up one morning & cannot logon. Until then will continue to enjoy getting prices I cannot get anywhere else.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 4th June 2014, 10:58 AM
FredTheMug FredTheMug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stugots
will worry about it when I wake up one morning & cannot logon.


That happened to me a few times when I was getting started, quite distressing. With Betfair's future uncertain, best not leave more money than absolutely needed in BF accounts.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 4th June 2014, 03:46 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FredTheMug
That happened to me a few times when I was getting started, quite distressing. With Betfair's future uncertain, best not leave more money than absolutely needed in BF accounts.

Who says its uncertain? Betfair are making a profit. They are not going anywhere.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 4th June 2014, 03:59 PM
FredTheMug FredTheMug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 102
Default

I meant Betfair Australia, which isn't making a profit. But yeah I was being dramatic.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 4th June 2014, 04:11 PM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FredTheMug
I meant Betfair Australia, which isn't making a profit. But yeah I was being dramatic.



Betfair Australia is a 50:50 joint venture between Betfair and Crown Limited. Net revenue was up 13% in the year, driven by a 23% increase in Australian racing revenues. Following the decision of certain states to implement turnover-based race field fees, Betfair Australia increased the base rate of commission from 5% to 6.5% on Australian horseracing. This change in pricing structure was the driver of the increase in horseracing revenue. The revenue growth, however, was insufficient to cover the increased race field fees and our share of underlying operating profits reduced to £1.4m (FY12: £2.4m).
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 4th June 2014, 04:26 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FredTheMug
I meant Betfair Australia, which isn't making a profit. But yeah I was being dramatic.

As stugots just showed. They made roughly 4-5million Australian dollars profit (covert from pounds to aussie dollar). Its obviously going just fine and growing each year.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 4th June 2014, 04:29 PM
FredTheMug FredTheMug is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 102
Default

I apologise, I was wrong. I read the following article on the SMH website which reported a $1.6m loss for year ending April 2013 and assumed they were talking about the AU operation:

http://www.smh.com.au/business/crow...0318-3506r.html

I wouldn't have a clue how to interpret an annual report so thanks for the correction.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 4th June 2014, 05:33 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FredTheMug
I apologise, I was wrong. I read the following article on the SMH website which reported a $1.6m loss for year ending April 2013 and assumed they were talking about the AU operation:

http://www.smh.com.au/business/crow...0318-3506r.html

I wouldn't have a clue how to interpret an annual report so thanks for the correction.


That article is so incorrect. The year before betfair made the following in its annual report:

Quote:

Share of income from joint venture – Betfair Australia
Betfair Australia generated 21% revenue growth (in local currency), driven
by a strong horseracing performance
and improved monetisation of Exchange
activity. Revenue growth was driven by higher ARPU following an increased focus
on higher value customers.
The joint venture achieved a breakeven result for
the first time. Our reported share of the venture’s net operating profit was
£4.3m (FY11: loss of £0.9m). Excluding the £1.9m one-off net benefit of a sales
tax refund and costs associated with the High Court appeal our share of
operating profit was £2.4m.


So betfair is making lots of money year in and year out. The SMH reporter must not have done their research properly (which took a whole 5 seconds).
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 4th June 2014, 05:48 PM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UselessBettor
So betfair is making lots of money year in and year out. The SMH reporter must not have done their research properly (which took a whole 5 seconds).



Now can we think of any reasons why a paper would incorrectly report such a thing? Hmm, let me take 5 seconds to come up with half a dozen
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655