Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 16th July 2005, 09:06 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Red face

A losing day yesterday. I will give it one more chance.

Rosehill
R4 nos. 1, 5, 6, 8, 9 (no.2)
R6 nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 11 (no.10)
R8 nos. 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 (no. 3)
Dombeen
R1 nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 (no.7)
R4 nos. 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 (no.1
R5 nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (no.1)
Gold Coast
R4 nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (no.1)
R5 nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 (no.3)
Kembla
R4 nos. 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 no.1)
R5 nos. 4, 6, 8, 9, 11 (no1)
Warrack'beal
R5 nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10 (no.2)
R6 nos. 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11 (no.2)
R7 nos. 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11 (no.5)
R8 nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 (no.1)
Toowoomba
R3 nos. 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 (no.2)
R5 nos. 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 12 (no.3)

Outlay $207.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16th July 2005, 03:42 PM
angel417 angel417 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 43
Default

Doomben
R7
Banker No. 3/1-2-7-8-9@ 2 units
R8
Banker No. 3/1-4-5-6-7-8-11-14@ 2 units
Rosehill
R7
Banker No.1/2-3-4-5-8@ 2 units
R8
Banker No. 3/1-5-6-7-8@ 2 units
Moonee Valley
R7
Banker No.2/1-3-4-5-6@ 2 units
R8
Banker No. 2/1-3-4-5-7-8-9-10@ 2 units
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17th July 2005, 06:27 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Hi Michaelg,

I find quinella betting frustrating , always so close & always just missing out.
If one can pick them ,the value can be had if the O/L is not too much.
It`s amazing how many box headed no hopers get up.

One idea of getting the outlay down ,is to take the RadioTABQ or any other reliable source`s, firsts 2 selections , as anchor bets & place the others around them.
E.g.123456
RadioTABs first 2 selections could be say 1 & 2
1/3456
2/3456
Cost , if boxing ,would normally be 6x5 divided by 2 =15
This way the cost would be $8

The RadioTAB top 2 selections gets 1st or 2nd approx 53% of the time .
Check it out.


Cheers.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17th July 2005, 01:06 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

Bags, iv'e tried that before and sometimes the 1 & 2 [eg:] get up and i get zilch, i limit boxing quinella's to 4 selections, or take a standout with up to 6 for 2nd pick[ max: $6 per $1 bet], and also avoid small fields as i always get trapped by them and the value is normally not there.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17th July 2005, 01:37 PM
iamcool iamcool is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 110
Default

Something i have been toying with is boxing the TAB selections for an "Any2" combination. At first glance and without any substantial testing it seems to provide some consistent results. Outlay = $3

Quinellas could drive a fella to drink with the amount of times anything good, bad or ugly beats my selection for second.

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17th July 2005, 01:53 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

Heard before that the any 2 bet is pretty good, but iv'e been spelling since Doncaster day will resume in August for the spring carnivals,havent bet during winter for the last 2 years[ punt up on the footy], not sure if that bet type has come in NSW or not, i'd better pull my finger out and find out and start watching a few race or i'll be that far behind it wont be funny.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17th July 2005, 02:03 PM
angel417 angel417 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 43
Default

Tired of banging my head against the wall with you guys,you just wont listen,or is it because I am not in the "clique/"that seems to be commonplace on this forum these days?
Baghwan,no offence intended,but I cannot get my head around your post.You obviously have a large following here,so can you do a Pauline and "please explain" how or what the logic is in standing out
1/3-4-5-6
2/3-4-5-6
and not coupling 1/2???
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17th July 2005, 02:13 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Talking

Angel, hope you dont get a headache
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17th July 2005, 02:21 PM
iamcool iamcool is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by angel417
Tired of banging my head against the wall with you guys,you just wont listen,or is it because I am not in the "clique/"that seems to be commonplace on this forum these days?
Baghwan,no offence intended,but I cannot get my head around your post.You obviously have a large following here,so can you do a Pauline and "please explain" how or what the logic is in standing out
1/3-4-5-6
2/3-4-5-6
and not coupling 1/2???

I'm not sure what's going on here angel??
Perhaps banged head once to often - lol
What do you mean by coupling?
Coupling for what - first and second place?
Coupling 1/2 for first?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 17th July 2005, 02:25 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

he means taking 1 & 2 in the quinella ,as the 2 standouts cover all the other combinations bar that one
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655