Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Sports and Gambling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10th August 2009, 01:47 PM
Chuck Chuck is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus
It's very open. Has Collingwoods's Swan previously attracted the umpires' votes?


Swan came 4th two years ago so is obviously on the umps good side. can't say the same about didak and co which works in his favour.

i still wouldn't count out ablett though...

SWAN, D (COLL) $2.10
JUDD, C (CARL) $4.00
ABLETT JNR., G (GEE) $5.50
DAL SANTO, N (STK) $7.00
SELWOOD, J (GEE) $7.00
MONTAGNA, L (STK) $11.00
GODDARD, B (STK) $14.00
BROWN, J (BRIS) $15.00
CHAPMAN, P (GEE) $16.00
RIEWOLDT, N (STK) $16.00
BLACK, S (BRIS) $21.00
BOYD, M (WBD) $51.00
DIDAK, A (COLL) $67.00
GOODES, A (SYD) $67.00
HAYES, L (STK) $67.00


to lay off or not to lay off...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 19th September 2009, 06:15 PM
Abs Abs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 77
Default

Well i will be putting everything i have in my bank account, haha not much at the moment, on swan getting top 5 at $1.80. Surely had a better year then last and i think 14 games with over 30 disposals (some over 40) should put him as a big chance to win.

Go west coast
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21st September 2009, 10:56 AM
Abs Abs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 77
Default

PHANTOM LEADERBOARD
29 – G.Ablett (Geel)
27 – D.Swan (Coll)
24 – C.Judd (Carl)
20 – N.Riewoldt (St K), A.Goodes (SS)
19 – J.Brown (BL), B.Goddard (St K)
18 – L.Montagna (St K)
16 – M.Murphy (Carl), A.Didak (Coll), S.Mitchell (Haw), N.Dal Santo (St K), L.Hayes (St K)
14 – B.Fevola (Carl), P.Chapman (Geel)
13 – A.Sandilands (Fre), J.Selwood (Geel)
12 – M.Pavlich (Fre), B.Harvey (NM), M.Boyd (WB)
11 – S.Goodwin (Ade), R.O'Keefe (SS), J.Akermanis (WB), A.Cooney (WB)
10 – J.Porplyzia (Ade), S.Black (BL), M.Clark (BL), B.Gibbs (Carl), B.Stanton (Ess), S.Johnson (Geel), J.McVeigh
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 22nd September 2009, 10:09 AM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,066
Default

Boy, that was pretty close to the mark with most of the players. Big loser though was Swan. Bad luck, Chuck. Not sure what happened there. Maybe the umps don't like tattoos?

There are certain guys that you can just about guarantee will poll well every time, even if they don't seem to have had such a brilliant year - Judd, Black & Goodes. And Lenny Hayes might be falling into that category now too. I think he's polled pretty well before and last night, he was only about 4th or 5th in betting for the St Kilda team, but managed to get top 3 overall.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 22nd September 2009, 10:11 AM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus
What about everyone who took the shorts about Gary Ablett? I wonder what they're doing now? Counting their losses?


Nope.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 22nd September 2009, 01:02 PM
Stix Stix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abs
Well i will be putting everything i have in my bank account, haha not much at the moment, on swan getting top 5 at $1.80. Surely had a better year then last and i think 14 games with over 30 disposals (some over 40) should put him as a big chance to win.

Go west coast
Ouch.....!

Swan was disappointing, but it's not his fault...umpires are a weird breed.
__________________
Stix
.......Giddy Up..... !!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 22nd September 2009, 01:33 PM
Abs Abs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stix
Ouch.....!

Swan was disappointing, but it's not his fault...umpires are a weird breed.
Haha, yer well i am a poor uni student so there is never much in there anywayz. It seems like in a couple of games were i expect D.Swan to be called at for 3 votes it was S. Pendalbury

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportz
Maybe the umps don't like tattoos?
But Beams? has tats of a similar nature and he got a few votes as well, so not sure
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 23rd September 2009, 12:16 PM
luv2bet luv2bet is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 939
Default

was with a few mates on weekend and had a carton with each of them that swan would not be in top 5. If possesions were everything the likes of joel bowden would be winning medals.
The likes of judd, ablett, black, the players that continually run through those lines in packs and still get the high numbers (with huge tags) are the ones that should get the votes. Also, a lot of teams wont even put a strong tag on swan because they dont believe his influence on games is that strong.
my 2 cents anyway, the umps got it right for once!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 23rd September 2009, 03:13 PM
Chuck Chuck is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by luv2bet
was with a few mates on weekend and had a carton with each of them that swan would not be in top 5. If possesions were everything the likes of joel bowden would be winning medals.
The likes of judd, ablett, black, the players that continually run through those lines in packs and still get the high numbers (with huge tags) are the ones that should get the votes. Also, a lot of teams wont even put a strong tag on swan because they dont believe his influence on games is that strong.
my 2 cents anyway, the umps got it right for once!


you do realise that Swan led the comp in direct score assists for a great deal of the season....
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 23rd September 2009, 04:31 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,066
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abs
But Beams? has tats of a similar nature and he got a few votes as well, so not sure


Perhaps the umps got 'em mixed up, and Beams got the votes that should have gone to Swan.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655