Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > General Topics
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 5th April 2012, 11:34 AM
Raven Raven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 225
Default

Seems odd that the dishlickers are embracing the gross revenue model. Maybe they see the potential benefits of BF to punters & therefore to their industry.

Since I began laying in May last year, I have made a 22.8% profit. If BF increase their cut to 10%, according to my spreadsheet the profit would drop to 18.7%. I guess I can live with that.

But then again I may have to ask Moeee to teach me about form study for the grey's.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 5th April 2012, 11:54 AM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,365
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun
I will take bets it is an increase in all racing markets, why just get back to where you were when you have the opportunity to increase it.


I think it will be an increase in all AUS markets also.
They need to not only address this NSW situation, but also allow for future rulings as a precedence has now been set.

With commission as it stands, various additional premium charges and now a turnover tax, there is no doubt that at the lower end of the market other products will be better for backers.

One question remains, will they calculate turnover as they do matched amounts, i.e. back plus lay, or only the backers stake.
If it's both, then I'm in huge trouble.

1.5% of turnover is a massive hit, considering 1% in commission reduction makes such an impact calculated on winnings only.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 399,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/03/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 6th April 2012, 08:29 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

There is a smelly Rort that the TAB's use when they are caught up with Losing Wagers.

What TAB does when the approximate dividend for a Place mathematically works out to less than $1 , they are compelled by legislation to pay the Minimum Dividend of $1 or $1.04 , instead of finding the Extra Money from their Profits , they take it out of the place payouts from the other runners.

Perhaps Betfair could do something similar by introducing a Rule that whenever the 1.5% Turnover Commision exceeds the 5% Profit Commision on a single Wager , some Safety Rule kicks in.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11th April 2012, 10:21 PM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,456
Default

__________________
One Drive

"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out."
--moeee
_______________________________________________
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:52 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655