Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 30th June 2012, 10:10 PM
Vortech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I use Bet Selector as the base and then apply some other little magic filters I have found on my journey.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 30th June 2012, 10:45 PM
AngryPixie AngryPixie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vortech
I have about 75 variables at the moment with different weightings applied.

__________________
Pixie
"It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 30th June 2012, 11:18 PM
Star Star is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AngryPixie

My thoughts exactly. But more power to Vortech.

Star
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 1st July 2012, 02:43 AM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,456
Default

I use a similar approach but use only 9 variables and a couple of those may contain 2/3 variables with in them.

Days since last start is one variable but i use the last 2 starts for calculations.
__________________
One Drive

"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out."
--moeee
_______________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 1st July 2012, 05:28 AM
Vortech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun
I use a similar approach but use only 9 variables and a couple of those may contain 2/3 variables with in them.

Days since last start is one variable but i use the last 2 starts for calculations.

Thanks Shaun. This is a approach I might need to lean towards.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 1st July 2012, 06:46 AM
Star Star is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vortech
Thanks Shaun. This is a approach I might need to lean towards.
So Vortech. Your ratings are a : Watch this space. 75 plus 2 more and counting.

Sorry, if that does not come across as I mean it, which is just how much effort this systems business can get.

What I am thinking at the moment should not be put in this thread incase somebody misunderstands exactly what I mean. I will wait a few days because I do not want to appear disrespectful to others here because we all use a different approach , have different temperments and a few long termers have a very long memory.

It will be the subject of yet another thread. I can hear a few moans in the background. Oh no!. Another thread by Star.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 1st July 2012, 07:25 AM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,456
Default

Np Star we all learn by asking questions and no ones opinion on the way things should be done is always the only way it can be done.
__________________
One Drive

"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out."
--moeee
_______________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 1st July 2012, 09:29 AM
Barny Barny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
Default

A certain poster on here said Ratings take everything into account. This poster uses R&S Ratings I believe.

IF your commercial Ratings take everything into account, then they've weighted ALL the Variables to achieve an optimum outcome. IF you apply your own filter / s to these ratings then the weightings of the Ratings variables will be tipped over so that they're out of whack / sync, and not how the developer had set them up. They will then be heavily weighted towards the filter you applied. And, the filter you applied may also impact directly on other filters, so it just ends up like a dogs breakfast and the logic of the original set-up is out the window ..... and you wonder why it doesn't work !!!!!

IF your commercial Ratings take everything into account, the ONLY filter you could apply is a price filter.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 1st July 2012, 09:34 AM
Barny Barny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
Default

You could apply a race filter obviously ..... sigh
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 1st July 2012, 10:32 AM
Vortech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think commercial ratings also very limited in relation to

- Track conditions
- Distances
- Gender of horse
- Location
- Field Sizes
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:21 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655