Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 31st August 2004, 09:52 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hammers, you brain dead moron, you are nothing but a s..tstirrer. Here is my post, nothing like how you interpreted it.

"I read somewhere that suggested a 4/1 odds has a 17% chance of saluting the judge.

Does that mean that a 4/1 odds has an 85% chance of producing one winner every five races?"

Now go away.


Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 31st August 2004, 10:13 AM
Hammers Hammers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 148
Default

Butternut,

I gave you an answer. It was based on mathematics.

You bleat when no one praises your wizardry (????) and no one answers your email requests.

More than one contributor has helped out but you still don't get it. I'm not s stirring, I'm trying to help you as you need it.

5 17% winning prospects do not have an 85% chance of cracking one winner. That misguided logic would mean that 6 17% prospects have 102% chance of one winner which even to a simpleton cannot make sense.

Only trying to help. I will do as you say and go away as I'm afraid you appear beyond help.

One last piece of advice. Give up the punt and get into macrame or something else - you have neither the mental agility nor the temperament to make a go of gambling.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 31st August 2004, 10:59 AM
davez davez is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 301
Default

a bit of fire in the forum! got to love it!

&, whilst i am no mathematician, i would think that hammers has hit the nail on the head!!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 31st August 2004, 01:58 PM
AssumeTheCrown AssumeTheCrown is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Gippsland, Victoria
Posts: 223
Default

If each of your selections is a 17% chance of winning, then the chance of backing at LEAST one winner out of 5 bets is about 60%.

This is calculated by working out the probability of backing NO winners in 5 bets and is equal to .83^5 = .3939 = 39.39%. Therefore if there is a 39.39% chance of backing NO winners in 5 bets then there must be a 60.61% chance of backing one or more winners. This is based on the assumption that each bet is independant of any other.

See JFC's post for breakdown of chances as they are correct!

[ This Message was edited by: AssumeTheCrown on 2004-08-31 14:00 ]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 2nd September 2004, 11:26 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From Hammers to me "One last piece of advice."

If ever I need advice from an imbecile I'll give you a call. You would have to have the IQ of a house brick. If you cannot see that some of my posts are tongue in cheek then you really do need to try and reverse that charisma bypass operation you had!!

Say Hi to pjjp for me, you only need to look in the mirror!

Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 2nd September 2004, 02:49 PM
Squirter Squirter is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Takanini
Posts: 270
Default


Keep ya cool there ole timer.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 2nd September 2004, 04:58 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks Squirter ..... yesterday at Sandown there were three winners in five races. An outlay of $200.00 for a return of $2,003.40. This goes with the return of $3,960.00 one week ago. I'm not suggesting anything, other than consider doing the opposite to chasing one's losses, and maybe not concentrating so much on a mechanical system.

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 4th September 2004, 08:33 AM
Hammers Hammers is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 148
Default

But A Nut

Mythical wins - still works for a boss.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 5th September 2004, 08:04 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
On 2004-09-02 16:58, Butternut wrote:
Thanks Squirter ..... yesterday at Sandown there were three winners in five races. An outlay of $200.00 for a return of $2,003.40. This goes with the return of $3,960.00 one week ago. I'm not suggesting anything, other than consider doing the opposite to chasing one's losses, and maybe not concentrating so much on a mechanical system.


Wouldn't mind getting returns like that for investment of $200.
Can't quite see how you done it.
Don't want to steal anything off you,but what's the go.Treble.all-up,quaddie,what?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 5th September 2004, 08:11 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Hey JFC WHERE YA BIN?

Like your stuff.
Now that the AFL season is almost gone,want to get something happening with the greyhounds.
Stick around my main man.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655