Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Sports and Gambling
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 4th April 2005, 11:31 AM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,066
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr ed
Bad luck Jose, takes balls to back your judgement, post a thread like this and back it up with a large bet.


Yes, but it was just not a game where you should have labelled any team as a certainty. The Cowboys against the Knights was definitely the best bet of the weekend, not the out of form Roosters against the in form Tigers.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 4th April 2005, 04:34 PM
Searay Searay is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 54
Default

Ah sportz, if u go back and read the thread you will find that he said the cowboys are capable of producing a shocker and he thought they were due. I only replied to that context and never in my reply did i accuse him of him saying they were going to lose.......... I just wanted to fill him in that in the past 16-18 months i havent seen the cowboys even play badly.......
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 4th April 2005, 04:51 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,066
Default

Oh sorry. Didn't see that.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 5th April 2005, 12:03 AM
Mr ed Mr ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: melbourne
Posts: 721
Default

I haven't seen a game of league for over a year Sportz, i really wouldn't have a clue, just trying not to kick a man while he's down.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 6th April 2005, 01:39 AM
knowledge knowledge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 664
Default

jose u really make these forums seem f-cking useless with amazingly bad tips like this.

i dont mean to be insulting or offensive but come on... 1.28 "bet of the century" and it lost you can't expect anyone to listen to you from now on.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 6th April 2005, 07:39 AM
Floydyboy Floydyboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 982
Default

GEEZ MR K thats a bit harsh .........Ive seen some "nailed on certainties" put up by other people on here that went down in a screaming heap.....and to qualify that I think he said to stay away from his tips ....goodmorning ... hi ho hi ho its off to work i go ...got to earn some money so the poor bookies can feed their families
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 6th April 2005, 01:42 PM
knowledge knowledge is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 664
Default

i know it was harsh and i've also seen 'nailed on' results lose. I've predicted things to win at times and suggested they were certain and seen them LOSE too, but the way jose put so much emphasis on how certain this win was and considering the low low odds and to make things worse, the "TIP OF THE CENTURY" label AND then it LOST!!!!!!... it's all like a nightmare.

better luck next time jose.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 7th April 2005, 11:38 AM
BJ BJ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 479
Default

Couldn't really call it a tip of the century with so many other people tipping them. @$1.28 obviously they are short priced favourites and expected to win. I would like to see the next tip of the century to at least pay even money....
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 7th April 2005, 12:37 PM
thefan thefan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 285
Default

How about Tigers to bt Warriors

why?

* Tigers did thrash the warriors last year at the very same stadium
*Make that 46 points
* Scott Prince is in form
* Hodgeson hasnt missed a goal as of yet
* Tigers did beat the bulldogs and roosters

They are paying $2.35 or +4.5
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 7th April 2005, 08:36 PM
Jack Daniels Jack Daniels is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thefan
How about Tigers to bt Warriors

why?

* Tigers did thrash the warriors last year at the very same stadium
*Make that 46 points
* Scott Prince is in form
* Hodgeson hasnt missed a goal as of yet
* Tigers did beat the bulldogs and roosters

They are paying $2.35 or +4.5


I for one won't be on the Tigers to win this one in Christchurch.

I watched both games with interest last week and to my shock the Tigers won over a strong Roosters side, not taking anything away from the Tigers win but the Roosters where not on par with the Tigers skills last weekend. But neither was the Ref.

As for the Warriors they came out fired up in the second half and absolutely smashed Souths alloer the park. I think the Warriors have geled as a side and should dispose of the Tigers with ease.

Warriors 13+
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:53 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655