Thread: Ultimate Risk
View Single Post
  #21  
Old 18th January 2008, 06:19 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,426
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by King Cugat
well hang on there pal....an earlier post you said that this trainer nth of the border wouldnt risk his license to lay his horse. now your saying they wouldnt bother?

Again hes a little struggling trainer in QLD who felt the E.I. strains . Your saying that if he layed his horse to win $20k he might lose his license...then turn around and say $50k is ok?

this is getting more stoopid

the bottom line here prince is.
i made an observation that i thought looked very out of the oridinary on 1 particular race. the horse ran and was gone at the 500m mark according to the jockey.
You came on and started telling me about past things and i was wrong.
i said again that sure tomorrow at Sydney there will be many large lays that win. im not refering to them and when the time comes they should be based upon the environment at the time.
Why do i have to make an opinion or observation then told to prove it. An observation / opinion is exactly that. if every post on this site was told they must prove it then what would happen?
Does anyone ask Jimbo why he must prove that he hasnt tipped a horse?
DO we ask Pengo to prove he uses monopoly money to bet with?
Do we ask Mr Qauddie if he really does put $500 on everything he says he does?
if i didnt hear of what goes on i sstables in wouldnt have posted it. I too wiish it dodnt happen, i am also realistic enough to know that those blokes in the bush who dont get given chances with top class horses need to bet aswell.
There was a reason we didnt want betfair...you think that everyones kept their promise?
the first line on my thread was i still think its the #1 site for betting. I said that for more then 1 reason.....it helps more then desperate punters.


I said you are entitled to your opinion, but I don't agree with it.

But you said initially...

Someone knew exactly what was going on. This was 1 lone sole with an awfully big gripe with an odds on horse that just happened to tail right off.

And I disagree.

There are plenty of punters that know how Canterbury treats it's favourites.
and 50,000 is not a lot of money or liability when talking about $1.70 to $1.88.
And the hot Waterhouse favourite was beaten in a previous race.

You happened to see some money and a poorly performing horse.
Your conclusion is hype driven, but you're allowed to have it.

The reason of proof is because you are casting aspertions on the trainer and the jockey when it might be an innocent fumble.
It's unfair no matter who it is.
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 412,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/12/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote