29th July 2009, 08:36 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 368
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moeee
Nice Work.
I wonder if it is possible to run your program again and perhaps look at a graph of the UPS and DOWNS on the way to that 1% similarity at the end of the ride.
If you do, I'ld figure that the 3rd method would result in the less bumpy ride.
|
Not what you would think 3rd method was the wildest ride because the turnover was much higher (2 1/2 times higher than the 2%)
1. 2% bank high 10.9% low -26.1%
2. level stakes bank high 8.15% low -12.7%
3. betting to price bank high 27.2% low -67.6% |