View Single Post
  #5  
Old 30th December 2003, 04:29 PM
stebbo stebbo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Yarra Valley
Posts: 241
Default

Hello hermes,

with all due respect, I wouldn't advise anyone to try to bet based on this "system" For a start, all 3 of your winners today break at least one of your original rules.

2. Eliminate races where the highest is 7 or less.
3. Selection is the next down. Eg. Radio Tab highest = 8 then selection is #9. Bet to place.
5. If Radio Tab highest numbered pick is the bottom weight, pass the race.


MOG : TAB #7 so should be pass
ROC : R2 #4 is bottom weight so should be pass
ROC : TAB #5 so should be pass

Also, you started out suggesting people bet for the place, not the win.

I think you can find patterns like this quite frequently... I've noticed that quite frequently you get 3 consecutive numbers in a box trifecta at the greyhounds... And that if they're 123 they pay crappy, but 567 pays well.... What would be really useful is to determine situations where these patterns might occur.

I do like your idea about identifying races where the low weights have a chance of running well... that deserves some further investigation.

Cheers,
Chris.
Reply With Quote