I had a break from racing yesterday and just as well! The Radio Tab tipsters were spot on throughout the day. If they called #11 then #11 was in the money. So you get days where this phenomenon just disappears and any system based on it crashes.

But today there was a fortune to be made from this group of runners - one TAB above the highest numbered Radio Tab tip.

Eagle Farm R 3 = #11 = pl. 2.20
Eagle R7 #7 = pl. 5.50

Radnd wick R1 #7 = 5.60 the win 2.70 pl.
Rand R4 #5 = 2.40 pl.
Flemington @1 #4 $44.80 the win, 9.00 pl.
Flem R2 #7 2.40 pl.
Flem R5 #6 $4.30/1.90

Gold Coast R1 #13 = 8.90
Gold Coast R2 #6 = 2.70
Gold Coast R6 #5 = 1.90
Gold R7 #8 = $22.60/5.10
Gold R8 #9 = 13.80 pl.

Inverell R4 #12 5.60 pl.
Bairnsdale R6 #10 3.70 pl.

Vic Park R3 #6 4.60 pl.
Ascot R4 #7 2.70
Ascot R6 #10 Indigo King

Following the original rules I posted at the beginning of this thread, today was a good day.

More generally, it continues to show the potential of this group of runners as a whole.

In my trials you get some BIG winners. We saw one today - R1 at Flemington. Radio Tab picked 1,2 and 3 and #4 won for $44. I need much bigger samples of data to determine if winners like this can be depended upon over a period of time. I don't mind bad days like yesterday if I can score $44 winners often enough.

In my trials so far I'm striking a big winner (around $50) more regularly than every 50 races, on average. Promising.

I tend to weed results like big winners out of my trials. I usually remove the top 10% winners and 10% losers. But I'm beginning to think this might be a way towards a system that chases those biggies.

Any suggestions appreciated.

Hermes

and a happy New Year!