
23rd March 2011, 06:25 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,403
|
|
See that would only make sense depending how the bets were selected, such as they were starting in race 1 and working race to race looking at the option that in earlier races more of there selections won than in later races.
It would depend on why they selected those runners to determine if stopping in the middle of a cycle and waiting until the end of the cycle made sense, rather than just starting a new cycle if the basis was mathematical.
|