View Single Post
  #10  
Old 28th June 2011, 10:51 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,426
Default

Yeah not happy.

As IAS are pure ratings, and Betchoice are track openers, it's not a question of which is more accurate or more correctly which is more profitable.

IAS kills track odds for ratings.

IAS are ratings done by the best in the business.
Track odds are done by Vince Aspinall, with an adjusment for early money (prepost).
Then the bookies play follow the leader.

A simple indication and quantification is that one can make a killing backing horses that open shorter on track than IAS openers.
A double edge is to be had laying those that open longer on track than IAS openers.

But we've been down this road before, better go before the next ebook or website is launched by the plagiarists out there.

You know who you are >
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 412,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/12/2024
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote