
6th July 2011, 06:43 AM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 221
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun
I have played around with ratings for the past 20 years, even used a version of Don Scott's when i first started i had to hand type everything in to my old IBM JX computer i used a version of his race class tables but cut it down, i had some big collects back then just about every day i could find a 20/1 winner.
I progressed to form and weight and stayed there even when some changed to pace i didn't change, i dropped the weight as the limit increased, over the past 12 months i find my ratings only work in higher grade races these days as i think you still need form to win those races.
On the Punters Show the other day Marc talked about fitness and distance change and it did make sense and got me thinking, also the other fact that horses often repeat performances year in year out if trained the same way i need to come up with a few other ideas.
|
Morning Shaun,
The problem is most form guides are providing the same old data that we are all used to and then lean on to find winners. I used the Wizard for many years as it did have some different data but all the same could not find a profitable angle as it was based on Don Scott weight ratings.
Cheers
Twodogs
|