10th August 2011, 10:27 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
|
|
Used to be a lot of good discussions on here, years ago, maybeI’m not the best at starting them eh? I’ma bit disheartened at the lack of responses and whatever was said to me thatended up being moderated.
Silver and sand pretty much got to the guts of most of thepoints but there were two points that I consider important but I actuallycouldn’t be bothered going into a lot of detail because it appears worthless. But the summary of a couple of worthy pointsare;
1) Most systems end up with the first four in betting andthe comparable tote figures to the SP reflect the popularity and unders when asystem horse wins.
2) The improversmethod (which darkydog2002 touched on) outlined in my original post, with acouple of filters, and selecting the correct race (a 5/1 ffice:smarttags" />lace w:st="on">Melbournelace> Cup winner is the same as a 5/1winner at Wagga) throws up some serious longshots with maybe half a dozen betseach week.
I did say “All will be revealed” but I would really only be givingmy info to the lurkers who don’t bother posting. So I’m reneging.
|