3 Jan 09 - Cheltenham -1800m - $25k

WHOISHE - 4g - 5 1-1-1 - 12s03 - B 11 - 4.5 kg

Resumed with lacklustre 6 len 12th (55kg) to Jeunealistic1412 C’ham C3 dead trk Nov 22. Just fairduring hd 1-1/4 len 3^rd (54.5kg) Old Worlde, Truly lovely 1600M’ville C3 slow trk Dec 12. Fitter nowbut doubt he is going well enough to win this. Place best.

WON by a length @ 16/1 and paid $28.20 on the tote.

2nd line should read

WHOISHE - 4g - 5 1-1-1 - 12s03 - B 11 - 54.5 kg

i assume this issue is with excel or a form provider.

Not at all Shaun.

There's at least six examples for the punter to learn some very, very valuable info ..... I'd like comments then I'll give you the good oil !!!

..... and it's a relatively random selection

You've got my attention Barny, but this went whoosh over my head. Can you shed any more light for the dullards such as me?

__________________
"Not winning on a horse that came first is one thing.....Losing on a horse that didn't come first is something else entirely!!!"

You have been moderated for flaming. Take care. Moderator.

Flaming. This is not a thread about "grammar." Thanks. Moderator.

__________________
Jose'.

Random, but why is the example over 30 months old?

Flaming. These sorts of "all will be revealed" posts in racing forums just bait others. Please do not do this. Thanks. Moderator.

Ok Lets see.
This is a one out piece of data relating to one contender for an up comming race.
Had 5 starts for 3 placings, reasonable contender.
Of the 5 starts, we are only shown 4 (12s03)the fifth and first was unplaced
however, this exposed form shows potential.
It is increasing in distance (up 200m ea start) with only marginal weight
diff from first start back (.5kg) this would be considered within it's scope.
Track conditions of previous runs; dead to slow, if current conditions, same or better, it is in with a chance.
Days since runs about same approx 20 days.
Lightly raced
My money is on