22nd May 2012, 03:26 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 696
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vortech
Just an observation. If a ratings system is producing better results with the 1st, 3rd and 5th rater, wouldn't you not adjust the weightings behind the rules of variables to try and get the 3rd and 5th sitting as 2nd and 3rd respectively.
Or is it the 3rd and 5th have lower strike rates but better value?
Regards
|
You measure your handicapping/ratings by strike rates and you should have a smooth transition right thru the range,
Wagering, will have patchy results thru the range.
It's best to try an understand if your trying develop a rating system based on handicapping factors or a wagering system |