Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 21st May 2012, 06:24 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,330
Smile This Might Work

UNITAB or R+S Ratings or Eva ratings /Shauns Ratings

Selections are the 1st /3rd and 5th rated.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 21st May 2012, 07:17 PM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,403
Default

I will be straight up with mine when they start to fire the top 2 SR is better than the other 3 comnined.
__________________
One Drive

"If the corporates are treating you poorly , just go elsewhere."
"If they need you , they will soon find out."
"If you need them , you will soon find out."
--moeee
_______________________________________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21st May 2012, 07:50 PM
Barny Barny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkydog2002
UNITAB or R+S Ratings or Eva ratings /Shauns Ratings

Selections are the 1st /3rd and 5th rated.

Cheers

smokescreen was a good horse, remember that one?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21st May 2012, 08:24 PM
Vortech
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Just an observation. If a ratings system is producing better results with the 1st, 3rd and 5th rater, wouldn't you not adjust the weightings behind the rules of variables to try and get the 3rd and 5th sitting as 2nd and 3rd respectively.

Or is it the 3rd and 5th have lower strike rates but better value?

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21st May 2012, 09:58 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,330
Smile

I,m looking for better Value and needing minimum $4 on any of them.
My feeling is that really good priced winners i.e $16 + make up will make up for the losers I,m bound to get along the way.The other prices will be the bread and butter.
I,ve found that my yearly profit consists of striking the longer priced occasionally.

Shaun I,ve noted your comments on the top 2 and thanks.In your case I,ll accept $3 minimum.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21st May 2012, 10:31 PM
beton beton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 589
Default

I am just doing some research in my data base. 16+ runners in the $2.10-2.50 range second fav 12.63%. =8 runners same range 24.44%. in the $2.60 -3.00 range 12.75% and 23.65%. in the $3.10-3.50 range 16.55% and 22.09%.
The average overall for 2nd fav is 19.33% 1st has a 18% swing over these price and field ranges but that has to be expected. 3rd has only 3% variance 4th has 5.6% variance and we are talking 7.68% to 13.09%. These figures definately support 3 and 5. Beton
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22nd May 2012, 11:30 AM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,330
Smile

Thanks Beton
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22nd May 2012, 03:26 PM
woof43 woof43 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 696
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vortech
Just an observation. If a ratings system is producing better results with the 1st, 3rd and 5th rater, wouldn't you not adjust the weightings behind the rules of variables to try and get the 3rd and 5th sitting as 2nd and 3rd respectively.

Or is it the 3rd and 5th have lower strike rates but better value?

Regards

You measure your handicapping/ratings by strike rates and you should have a smooth transition right thru the range,
Wagering, will have patchy results thru the range.

It's best to try an understand if your trying develop a rating system based on handicapping factors or a wagering system
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22nd May 2012, 10:36 PM
Barny Barny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
Thumbs down

Barny, you are now also on notice. You have been TOUd for this post. It is not constructive and baits another member. If you object to someone's post then send in a TOU. No more warnings. Take care. Thank you. Moderator.

Last edited by Moderator 3 : 23rd May 2012 at 10:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 22nd May 2012, 11:59 PM
beton beton is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 589
Default

Barny
with respect
It takes half a second to ignore any post that you are not happy with. If his posts help one person then all his bad posts can be forgiven. We don't have to go too far back to when your posts were getting rubbished. Yet some of your posts did contain some valid points. I like most people here read the posts and work out for ourselves which ones we heed and which ones we ditch. I for one do not like the bitchiness that constantly raises it's ugly head.
It does not do you any justice and it does not help anybody.
Beton
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:48 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655