Hi Crash,
You speak with the authority of a man who is successful in what he does. I have no doubt your method works. Unfortunately you've developed a blinkered view of the subject and now seem unable to understand that anyone elses approach can work too. You seem to think that anyone who doesn't use the false favorites approach is a fool and Punter57 thinks the only way to go is backing the long shots which are overs. I'm sure you both do well with your own method but telling others they can't win because you don't or can't understand their methodology makes you a fool yourself.
Now I know sweet FA about racing but I'm a good programmer, love mathmatical puzzles and have a lot of time on my hands. Racing is custom built for me, hobbywise. I started programming racing stuff about 18 months ago and I'm quite comfortable with the consistent profit margin I'm enjoying thank you, from essentially mechanical systems. But I'll tell you what, I'm quite happy to look at the false favorites method too. In fact I'll be thinking about that when I go out to mow the grass in a minute, wondering how I can use it to enhance my computerised system. My mind is open.

Looking back over your quote above, yes, there is a computer based method of winning money from lotto. Unfortunately I haven't been game to use it as it attracts a long gaol term if you're caught. :-)

An finally, please don't put s..t on punters even if you're (mistakenly or not) sure their method can't work. It doesn't worry me because I know mine does but you might scare them off the game forever. You should encourage them, someone's got to put money into the pool for the rest of us to win. :-)

KV