12th November 2005, 01:48 PM
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 172
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dale
In the 2nd system i dont get rule 7),could you explain the reasoning behind asking for something as specific as won at track and distance and then turning around and ignoring that rule just because the horse was a last start loser at short odds.
|
Hi Dale!
" (7) Must have won at this track at this dist (c) or be a last start beaten fav"
If you read this carefully you will find that this statement is not a mutual exclusion, but an extra inclusion instead.
Ie. if it had not won on this track AND distance, it must have been a last start beaten fav. at least, to be included!
Cheers. |