Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
Reload this Page Neural inconsistency
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th March 2012, 05:27 PM
TWOBETS TWOBETS is offline
Member
  
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 204
Question Neural inconsistency
Don't want to keep harping on about the R&S site and it's occasional loss of plot, but here's a corker just to illustrate the dangers of using the neurals as a reliable base.

Randwick R7 N16 Rose of peace shows as lowest of all runners on CP neurals yet scores highest in the Career ratings score. This is clearly gobbledegook. It went on to win at around $220 on Betfew.

Go yonder and figurest thou.
__________________
"Not winning on a horse that came first is one thing.....Losing on a horse that didn't come first is something else entirely!!!"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17th March 2012, 05:48 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink
I'm sure the R & S people could provide a plausible explanation, but like you I'm at a loss. It seems it could not be more inconsistent.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17th March 2012, 05:52 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by TWOBETS
Don't want to keep harping on about the R&S site and it's occasional loss of plot, but here's a corker just to illustrate the dangers of using the neurals as a reliable base.

Randwick R7 N16 Rose of peace shows as lowest of all runners on CP neurals yet scores highest in the Career ratings score. This is clearly gobbledegook. It went on to win at around $220 on Betfew.

Go yonder and figurest thou.
My posts seem to disappear as soon as I put them up.
Could you point me to the rating?
I can't see this horse anywhere on top in any Neural ratings.
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th March 2012, 05:58 PM
Toil Toil is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 89
Default
I wonder if the CP is based on the last 12 mths? As its career best rating was just a couple weeks more then 12mths ago.

Where it ran 3rd over 1400m with 56kg in a 3yo-G2 race.

Got in lite and just needed a bit of pace it seems.

Go the swooper.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th March 2012, 06:06 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
  
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default
$220 is a nice price

i would be much too scared to offer anyone those sort of Odds for any horse - Not even against Black Caviar.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17th March 2012, 06:24 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by TWOBETS
Don't want to keep harping on about the R&S site and it's occasional loss of plot, but here's a corker just to illustrate the dangers of using the neurals as a reliable base.

Randwick R7 N16 Rose of peace shows as lowest of all runners on CP neurals yet scores highest in the Career ratings score. This is clearly gobbledegook. It went on to win at around $220 on Betfew.

Go yonder and figurest thou.
I'm sure I posted before but can't, for some reason see them, refresh doesn't help.

Are you sure you did not make a mistake? There is no rating in the Neurals where this horse is on top.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17th March 2012, 06:30 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
  
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
I'm sure I posted before but can't, for some reason see them, refresh doesn't help.


Yes you did post before.
I can see your previous post without any problems.

Might you have put yourself on "ignore"?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17th March 2012, 06:43 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
Yes you did post before.
I can see your previous post without any problems.

Might you have put yourself on "ignore"?
Thanks moeee, this is the utility PC we all use for the internet via the home network and my son used CCleaner and deleted all our settings.
In the process it scrambled up something.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 17th March 2012, 06:44 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,790
Wink
If the CP algorithym refers only to a period of 12 months it would be quite misleading especially horses that have raced for several years.

They may have had a very good/bad start sometime in their career, only to excel/stumble.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17th March 2012, 06:52 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelg
If the CP algorithym refers only to a period of 12 months it would be quite misleading especially horses that have raced for several years.

They may have had a very good/bad start sometime in their career, only to excel/stumble.
That may be Michael but I still can't find this horse on top in
any category.
Am I blind or missing something?
If so, all my research is was useless.
Bu.......!!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Contact Us - OZmium Pty Ltd - Archive - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655