#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hey guys
Anyone with stats wanna test this one? Rules .no maidens .distance 1200m + .starters 8-14 (inclusive) .starting price <=$2.50 .barrier 8 or less .58kg or less .last start <21 .senior jockey .distance within 200m last start All days Place bet only Winner winner chicken dinner! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Result
Place 84.62% +8.5% POT Very good. Win 50% -3% LOT
__________________
Cheers. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Cheers.
That is just a quick one I thought up haha... How many was the sample? One would imagine a huge amount of turnover? I forgot to mention to delete hurdles and 2yo's. The only downside would be physically watching each race and sticking to plan... Winner winner chicken dinner! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hey Bryzz,
You should get a gander at My BSA one posted for the "experts" on the PA site. $64 winner today. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hey darky I would but I got no clue what u are saying?
BSA? PA Site? I'm lost someone enlighten me please? By the way why is it I ran a six week trial of a new system it showed great potential about 42% s/r over 90 bets over 30% pot... Then I ran another trial from three months later and it may of well as been the how not to pick a winner system... So frustrating three days of over twelve hours a day going through form guides. And now I'm back to square one... Back to the drawing board for me How many ridgid rules would a solid system have??? I'm all ears about now Winner winner chicken dinner! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Welcome to the club Bryz55, we've all done exactly that many times. That is not to say that your method was a dud, but you would need at least (in my opinion) 1000 bets to truly evaluate it. What I try to do is then give it a dry run for at least 150 bets to try and pin it down. Even then you have to realise that there will be inexplicable bad runs, I've operated a place system for over 5 years, it stands at just over 4% POT. If I was to dissect it into 3 month bits there would be a lot of treading water and even losses in some 3 month periods.
That's the nature of the game, "tenacity" I reckon the way to go is decide on a bank for the project and stick to it through thick and thin, i.e. its only had it when the banks bust. Good luck! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bryzz,
PA punying ace Chockablock with BSA |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() So the letter r system is that dinkum or a joke? What sort of data backs it up?
Winner winner chicken dinner! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Na, absolute joke mate BUT, incredibly often performs better than anything else,
I don't go to the track much these days (ill health) but when I do I will often include these daft selections as they do (more than they should) just make an incredible day! I once had a 500-1 double with a $5 stake, idiot me cos it paid more than 800-1 @ tote odds. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ok 25 weeks checking my data (25 copies of TABForm back ordered)
Seln 130 W 40 Ret 149 Av div $3.70 Highest $5.70 POT ~13 % Based on fri sat sun only... Should I smile? Winner winner chicken dinner! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|