|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Testing Place System
For the past week the following system has shown about a 10% POT on Place betting using Unitab divvies. Unfortunately I haven't bet them.
1) Default neural settings. 2) Outright top in the Dist category. 3) Max distance of 1,400 metres. Unfortunately I haven't recorded the size of the fields. Five selections today. We'll see how they go. Geelong 3/9 Ipswich 1/7 6/2 Wagga 5/1 6/3 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Cheers |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
lomaca, if you would please.
There's been two selections today that have already run - a first and a fourth. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Races tested 6646 total return $5986.72 POT -11% S/R 40.26% All races all tracks all race type included. Does look like it has potential. The last time I ran this programme was about two years ago and now it seems to be uncommon sluggish so I have to look at it before I can test this idea in more detail. I included the test file printout that you can put into excel and see if you can find any clues. The attached zip is a textfile that will easily import into excel as a "fixed width" text file. Good luck |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Although some tracks seem to do better than others. All it needs is an other filter maybe size of field? Have to fix this routine before I do any more testing, it used to take about 10 minutes to do 50 thousand races and now it takes over an hour to do just 5 thousand, strange? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks, lomaca.
It's the usual story with the neurals - they don't perform too well with metro tracks. Unfortunately I know zero about computers so I can't offer any suggestions about the problem. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|