Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Archive > AFL Australian Rules Football Forum
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 19th May 2005, 05:35 PM
mug punta mug punta is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
Hang on Mugs!
I'm sure it was you who suggested that emotion was overrated.
Apologies if it weren't you.
Regardless,your money would be much safer in the bank than on Carlton.Cameron Bruce is back.


Granted, Mo, that was I. But, there are always exceptions to the rule!!
Plus, I dont think the Dees are that good.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 19th May 2005, 06:43 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
No Sportz.I'm not saying they qualify under the homedog system,but they qualify under the "how the effin' 'ell did they win system"
No logical reason why the homedog system should work,yet it does!


Sorry Mo, but I think there actually IS a logical reason why it works.

I personally think sticking to teams with a genuine home ground advantage is a damn good idea. Also, I NEVER back teams giving up a start but I do like to back teams receiving a start. Well, the homedog system is a combination of those two ideas. Admittedly though, you do sometimes have to back teams that you don't honestly think can win. This week for example, I think Collingwood will really struggle to stay within 30 points.

If you don't mind, can I just say that I think backing teams playing interstate hurt you last week. I noticed in your selections, you had Fremantle against Essendon in Melbourne and Port against Sydney in Sydney. Now I personally wouldn't have even thought of backing those two teams. I almost never back teams playing interstate, except in matches involving Brisbane, but you know I have different rules where my own team is concerned.

I hope you don't think I'm lecturing you because I don't claim to be any expert or anything. Just trying to help. That's why I suggested perhaps you should go back over your selections and try to look for a common denominator amongst the losing bets. Perhaps if you had cut out teams playing interstate, you might have done better. Or there might be something else you discover which will help you cut out losers in future.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 19th May 2005, 06:59 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Thanks for the input Sportz.
Problem with what I'm doing is there ain't enough bets.
If I eliminate those you suggested,I may well improve my profit margin,but at the expense of maybe a bet a month.
I think I'm more into quantity rather than quality.

Just found out my only collect was Round 2 where I had Fremantle away and Adelaide Away.(Depressed head here).

Last edited by moeee : 19th May 2005 at 07:07 PM. Reason: Added some more stuff
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 19th May 2005, 07:13 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,009
Default

Your only collect of the whole season???

I concentrate largely on home teams and I don't back any team under $1.40 or any team giving up a start. Given all that I still usually find at least 3 teams to bet on in AFL each week.

Are you taking multis? Perhaps you should go more for single bets???

Last edited by Sportz : 19th May 2005 at 07:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 19th May 2005, 07:45 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Yes only Multi's for me Sportz.
I did actually collect in Round 3 as well with Adelaide in the Derby into the Bombers.
I have a formula as you know,for just about everything,and it tells me which game or combination of games is the best value.
Obviously my formula is being fed erroneous data!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 19th May 2005, 07:57 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,009
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moeee
Yes only Multis for me Sportz.


I prefer to get far more regular but obviously smaller returns.

Last edited by Sportz : 19th May 2005 at 08:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 19th May 2005, 08:02 PM
moeee moeee is offline
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 5,359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportz
I prefer to get far more regular but obviously smaller returns.

Yes I've noticed your tips in the footy comp.
But even the short ones go down.
This seems to be an amazing year,and also it seems similar in the Super 12's I believe.
Wish I knew what factor it was that said Fremantle would beat the Pies by that ridiculous margin!
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 19th May 2005, 08:04 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,009
Default

The bets I've been making in the punting comp bare no resemblance to the bets I've actually been making with real money.

Don't ask. It's a superstition thing.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 19th May 2005, 09:01 PM
marko marko is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: western australia
Posts: 162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportz
Sorry Mo, but I think there actually IS a logical reason why it works.

I personally think sticking to teams with a genuine home ground advantage is a damn good idea. Also, I NEVER back teams giving up a start but I do like to back teams receiving a start. Well, the homedog system is a combination of those two ideas. Admittedly though, you do sometimes have to back teams that you don't honestly think can win. This week for example, I think Collingwood will really struggle to stay within 30 points.

If you don't mind, can I just say that I think backing teams playing interstate hurt you last week. I noticed in your selections, you had Fremantle against Essendon in Melbourne and Port against Sydney in Sydney. Now I personally wouldn't have even thought of backing those two teams. I almost never back teams playing interstate, except in matches involving Brisbane, but you know I have different rules where my own team is concerned.

I hope you don't think I'm lecturing you because I don't claim to be any expert or anything. Just trying to help. That's why I suggested perhaps you should go back over your selections and try to look for a common denominator amongst the losing bets. Perhaps if you had cut out teams playing interstate, you might have done better. Or there might be something else you discover which will help you cut out losers in future.



So will you be backing West Coast this week?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 19th May 2005, 09:12 PM
Sportz Sportz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,009
Default

Nope.

Collingwood (+29.5) is the system selection so that's what I will back. The fact that I'm not at all confident about their chances makes no difference. I'm in profit this year on AFL largely thanks to this system, so why go against it for this one game.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:12 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655