Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24th February 2004, 11:24 AM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

The other week i was mucking around with bits of other systems,so i put them together, going back 7 weeks [thats as all the form guides i kept] metro-saturdays
1. won T&D
2. 20% win S/R
3. raced last 28 days
4. placed last 2 starts [ eliminate if won last 2, looking for value]
5. If first up, must have won at least 50%
6. 1100-2000m

so far 30 selections for 8 wins =$54.30
17 placings =$38.20
10/1
mr 8 no.1 $4.60/1.90
no.2 unpl
no bris - ipswich, provincial track

17/1
mr 6 no.5 unpl
mr 7 no.5 unpl

24/1
sr 5 no.3 $4.30/1.50
ar 6 no.1 unpl

31/1
ar 7 no. 1 /1.90pl
br7 no. 6 unpl
no.17 unpl
mr 3 no.6 unpl
mr 8 no.2 unpl
no.3 /2.10pl

7/2
mr 5 no.1 $1.80/1.20
mr 7 no.7 /1.60 pl
sr 3 no.1 unpl
sr 4 no.1 $5.40/2.00
sr 6 no.1 $9.00/2.90
no.3 unpl
br 5 no.2 unpl
br 8 no.2 /1.70pl
ar 3 no.5 /2.30pl
ar 5 no.2 $9.80/3.50
ar 6 no. 7 unpl
ar 7 no.6 unpl
no.9 /2.30pl

14/2
sr 4 no.4 $7.00/2.60

21/2
mr 6 no.6 unpl
no.15 $17.10/5.40
sr 5 no.1 $5.10/1.80
sr 7 no.3 /2.00pl

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24th February 2004, 11:28 AM
sportznut sportznut is offline
Member.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Queensland
Posts: 2,266
Default

Not bad. Very sensible rules. A few seem quite familiar!!! :grin:

[ This Message was edited by: sportznut on 2004-02-24 12:29 ]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24th February 2004, 11:38 AM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

I know, just tinkering ,i have other ones but their a bit more involved. what do you think about rating horses, giving them points for t, d conditions , barriers ,s/r and prize money , out of 100
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24th February 2004, 12:58 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Default

How would you go if you eliminated 1st uppers and restricted the other bets to those who,s last start starting price was 10/1 or lower and perhaps to TAB no,s 1 - 5.
Cheers,
darky.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24th February 2004, 02:06 PM
emu emu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 13
Default

Goldmember,



I gather that if the runner is first up from a spell, then its last two placings prior to the spell are irrelevent.

Is that correct?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th February 2004, 12:20 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

Yes, that's right last 2 starts only apply to recent racing
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th February 2004, 12:58 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

very interesting darkydog, it's the opposite of that . the first uppers fared better for some reason?
11 selections : 4 wins - $34.90
7 placings- $18.00

last 2 starts
19 selections : 5 wins - $29.20
9 placings- $18.70

sorry, i missed counted 1 winner overall

30 selections - 9 winners

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25th February 2004, 01:34 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

Horses sp last start 10/1 & under

18 selections - 5 wins =$29.20
only 8 places overall = $17.00

tab no's 1-5,
17 selctions ,same "as above"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25th February 2004, 02:33 PM
emu emu is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 13
Default

Goldmember,

I pulled out The Sportsman on 6/2/04 to see if I could get your exact selections for Sat. 7th of Feb. .
I got most of the winners bar one. Sydney R4h1. I dont know how you picked that. It's win s/r is or was only 13.6%. Therefore no bet?
I also had picks that you didnt have like Syd.R5h4,h9.
Mel. R5h4, Adel.R2h3,h9. and so on.

What am I doing wrong?

I seems like a good system to follow for the next 6-8 months to see how it goes.
I'm not sure if I understand the won T/D section in the sportsman.
I assume your using The Sportsman. The section This Track(underneath a runners name) may have 1 in it and so to with This Dist. ,but where it says This T/D might have a 0 for the same horse. I'm just a tad confused with that aspect of the paper as I havent really used that info. before.

If you could help me out that would be great.




Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25th February 2004, 03:19 PM
goldmember goldmember is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: newcastle
Posts: 1,543
Default

Hi emu, your'e not doing it wrong syd r4 no.1 isn,t,i was using the other rules when i started and then added 20% later,my fault, forgot to delete him, i was doing them manually through a newspaper late at night, [must have nodded off] must have missed a couple. As for SR5,3 left out one rule must have 8 starters after scratchings [sorry]
I don't use the sportsman, but it's the same as any formguide won at track[t] won at distance[d] doesn't mean at this track and distance

cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 05:10 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655