|
|
To advertise on these forums, e-mail us. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
leroy,
That was all field sizes. Using last 3 starts as all wins and rating = 100, Same Condition Same distance 8+ field You get 31 Bets over 3 years for Win 92% , Place 117% Using last 3 starts as all wins and rating = 100, Same Condition Same distance You get 33 Bets over 3 years for Win 87% , Place 120% So not many bets at all.... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Cripes. That sounds like one of Norms systems.
Cheers. darky. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
hey darky,
You seen the rules to "hidden gems" yet ? Good Luck. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
wesnip, are you able to check metro tracks only?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for doing that Wesmip.
Cheers.
__________________
Cheers. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Wes,
your'e a legend. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
WESMIP
Contact me if you wish.
Cheers. darky. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
feather,
I can test Saturdays Only - SR, BR, AR, MR if your interested. Its close enough to Metro tracks. Good Luck. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Hey wes, just a couple of questions regarding your neural info, do you find that the CRS points are alot more accurate for some tracks as against others? It would seem to me that if you find a horse with a poor record at a particular track , then you may as well ignore their CPand Cf figures as well even if they are quite high.The more I look at the neurals, the more I tend to think that you would really need to apply a different setting on a track by track and distance by distance basis, does your info tend to support my theory? I also think it is more relevent to use rankings rather than actual points. Also could you run through how to get past neural results thanks, I know it was on a thread somewherebut cant seem to find it>
Last edited by DR RON : 25th October 2006 at 08:11 AM. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Wesmip
thank you, and yes, I do understand now |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|