Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 3rd March 2011, 07:09 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale
Garyf,

That wasnt my question,ive been at this long enough to know the realities of this game and what it takes to win,thank you!

If anyone can answer my question it would be appreciated.

Cheers.
"Id like to know what the strike rate and pot would be on highest average prizemoney earners who were not top prizemoney earners? "

Dale

If I read this correctly, you must mean it race by race, where I would have to exclude the top PM earner (not API), then select the highest API horse and see what the S/R and POT would have been?

Am I correct?

It can be done but would be a bit slow to run because one would have to practically re-rate past races. Should be easier to do it while checking results, day to day.
See what I can do.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 3rd March 2011, 07:25 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
"Id like to know what the strike rate and pot would be on highest average prizemoney earners who were not top prizemoney earners? "

Dale

If I read this correctly, you must mean it race by race, where I would have to exclude the top PM earner (not API), then select the highest API horse and see what the S/R and POT would have been?

Am I correct?

It can be done but would be a bit slow to run because one would have to practically re-rate past races. Should be easier to do it while checking results, day to day.
See what I can do.
Cheers
See post 28

Sorry Dale looks like someone is trying to make it into a race.
Happy to help but can't be bothered entering.

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 3rd March 2011, 08:25 PM
Dale Dale is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Bundy
Posts: 292
Default

Thanks Lomaca and Wesmip1,

I did think it would improve the figures,thanks for confirming.

Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 4th March 2011, 09:20 AM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Hi Stugots,
That 3 lenths was for last start winner that is Place ranked No.1

In other words -
Top plc Ranking
Won LS by 3+ lengths.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd March 2011, 04:47 PM
thorns thorns is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garyf

1ST RATED PLACE STRIKE RATE RANKING (21.7% s/rate)
And a (3% roi level stakes) i know of no other (1 stat only) betting
every race in australia every day that makes a (LEVEL STAKES PROFIT)

If you do me and a lot of pro punters would love you to tell us
you have found shangri-la.


cheers
garyf.
So the system is back the horse with the top place SR?
Or is there another rule to go with this?

If its just the one rule, it showed a pretty bad loss at TAB prices of around 20%.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 2nd March 2011, 05:26 PM
garyf
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

The year i surveyed a fair while ago it on a database it actually made a profit.
Hence i made it a rule with some filters for a mechanical system with form filters.
Now that i use ratings i haven't revisited it but like everything else may be losing in current times.

With the tote takeout and rounding down of dividends to about 18% and maybe people becoming aware of that years profitability imaybe now overbet.

Would be interested to know the period you surveyed what the s'rate was
and if it remained around the 20-21% mark?.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 2nd March 2011, 06:56 PM
garyf
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

A book called cosistency published by malcolm knowles several years ago actually made me aware of the profit the first ranked place % made.

I have the book sitting in front of me now it's a 16 page booklet outlying this fact with several pages on how to improve the level stakes profit.

For the life of me i can't find anywhere in the book to say the year it was published.

The front cover has a picture of about 6-7 horse and underneath the
words punting for profit through learning.

If anyone out there has a similiar copy who knows the year it was published
could you please post the details here the same year he published a book called prize money which i also have which may jolt someones memory.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 3rd March 2011, 06:04 PM
wesmip1 wesmip1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
Default

Quote:


Yeah i know you all want to know what the stat is that makes a level stakes r.o.i after 10.000> races betting all races australia wide right.

...

If you do me and a lot of pro punters would love you to tell us
you have found shangri-la.

Firstly the important stuff that very few people understand. I don't want anyone to take offense at this but the issue with most punters and I mean 99% of punters is they do not research thoroughly enough (or they don't know how to research properly) They do not understand the mathematics of what they are looking at. If you only understand basic probability then creating systems is not for you. If you understand advanced concepts on distributions, expectations, etc then you are going to have a basis from which you may do well.

Now back to the quote.

Do ratings count ?

I know of one selection filter that has 19000+ selections and makes a level stakes profit (1% to 34% depending on the odds you obtain on betfair).

I know of at least 1 free ratings available on the web that provides level stakes profit with no filters. (approx 2% after 9000+ bets).

I know of another rating system that is showing level stakes profit of 5% after 4500+ bets. (again free on the web)

I know of 1 stat (not a rating) that makes a level stakes profit.
Actually depending on what you use (top one or top few) you get a 1% profit or a 50% profit.

Are these stats and filters known to alot of people. Yes and No. But the stats I use are probably not known in the format I use it so the twist I use will probably remain hidden enough for me to make long term profits. Its worked for quite a few years already.


Now why would I give away my edge. Thats the ludicrus part unless I was going to sell books. (which I am not going to do).

Last edited by wesmip1 : 3rd March 2011 at 06:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 3rd March 2011, 06:21 PM
garyf
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Smile

Is this directed at me wes because the 1st pl% that was profitable 10 years ago that still maintains its s/rate but now these days has a lower average dividend is losing which as a straight stat i was unaware of.

When used with my ratings it's still profitable what i didn't know was that by itself it is now unprofitable.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 3rd March 2011, 07:12 PM
wesmip1 wesmip1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,601
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by garyf
Is this directed at me wes because the 1st pl% that was profitable 10 years ago that still maintains its s/rate but now these days has a lower average dividend is losing which as a straight stat i was unaware of.

When used with my ratings it's still profitable what i didn't know was that by itself it is now unprofitable.

gary,

Not spefici at you. Jsut general info for everyone.

Dale,

It doesn't make a difference. I can run it for you in 20 mins. Got to put my daughter to bed.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655