Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 26th November 2012, 06:32 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,788
Wink

L.G

I'm laying them for the minimum Liability of $30.

However, even though I often lay some of them for larger amounts I record them here as if I layed them for the $30 liability - I find it easier to keep records/results.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 26th November 2012, 06:49 PM
SpeedyBen SpeedyBen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 465
Default

Michael
This is going very well. Can you tell me what is the logic behind this selection method. I know little about the neurals except that the name sounds sexy.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 26th November 2012, 07:04 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelg
L.G

I'm laying them for the minimum Liability of $30.

.


Did you mean maximum of $30??

Cheers LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 26th November 2012, 07:41 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,788
Wink

Speedyben, someone on this forum said some time ago that the CP algorithym has the highest strike rate of all the neurals, but not the most profitable because of the generally low divvies.

I'm under the impression that laying the worst CP in the race is not profitable because the divvy would generate a very low profit, and an accident could take some time to recoup. So, taking the top half of the neural market I would expect that if the winner of the race was struck in this top half, then the divvy should be quite low which conversely results in a high lay-divvy. And having the lowest CP rating in this top half should produce a low strike rate which we want for lay-betting. I hope I haven't made my explanation too confusing.

If there is logic to this maybe the general illogicality to the neurals might neutralize this - I'm hoping it doesn't.

Lord Greystoke, $30 is the minimum allowable when laying on Betfair S.P. It seems high, and I (and some others) think it is.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 26th November 2012, 09:06 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,031
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelg
Lord Greystoke, $30 is the minimum allowable when laying on Betfair S.P. It seems high, and I (and some others) think it is.

I think it stinks that the minimum bet is $5 back or lay or, as you say, $30 lay liability at S.P. I also think it's a $50 minimum telephone bet.

I reckon they should bring it into line with the other betting operators here and make it say a 50 cent minimum bet like the Totes.

What are they doing, trying to encourage problem gamblers to lose their money even faster? That's a great corporate image to portray.
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 27th November 2012, 11:24 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,788
Wink

The Ocho, the only reason I can think of applying the $30 minimum is that if an outsider is layed and successful, then the profit is very low and the commission Betfair receives is even lower..and unacceptable to them. However, that's only my assumption.

Out of interest I'll list today's selections:

Port Macquarie
1/10
2/3
3/3
6/6
7/5

Bairnsdale
8/5

Townsville
3/9
6/8
7/6
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 27th November 2012, 06:38 PM
SpeedyBen SpeedyBen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 465
Default

Not even a placegetter amongst today's lot, Michael, even though a couple were in the market.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 27th November 2012, 07:02 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,788
Wink

Yes, it would have been a good day...pity!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 28th November 2012, 11:27 AM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,788
Wink

Today's selections are:

Ascot
2/13
9/9

Dombeen
5/6

Launceston
1/3
2/2
3/9
5/9

Gawler
5/3
7/5

Newcastle
5/7

I have layed the Ascot and Dombeen selections to S.P. Place as this is available at these venues.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 28th November 2012, 09:11 PM
michaelg michaelg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,788
Wink

There was an accident today for a loss $13.50.

After three days there's been 43 smiles from 44 selections for a profit of $36.72.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:14 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655